20 Nov 2006
The IT skills examination and training sector is facing a damaging split that will create confusion for technology professionals and their employers, industry experts warned today.
The problem stems from the appointment of the APM Group in July as the new accreditation body for IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) examination and training.
Analyst firm Gartner predicts that this will result in two competing computing training programmes after June 2007.
The protracted negotiations between APM Group and BCS-ISEB and EXIN, the two examining institutes prior to the appointment of APM Group, highlight the tensions which the new appointment has created.
Gartner warned that there is "little chance of any resolution at all", and certainly not by January 2007 when the contract takes effect.
As a result, APM Group is under significant pressure and is unlikely to have a scheme in place that meets the full demand for ITIL training in January.
However Gartner advises enterprises that this will not create significant problems in the short term because training will be available from BCS-ISEB and EXIN until June 2007.
Simon Mingay, research vice president for IT management strategies at Gartner, said: "The appointment of APM Group has created a division in the IT service management community, with APM Group on one side, the original examination institutes on the other, and the community split between the two camps.
"Their positions have progressively become more entrenched during the past two months, culminating in a press release on 13 November in which EXIN and BCS-ISEB announced their alliance in a signed memorandum of understanding.
"This will effectively create a parallel qualification scheme in competition with the official ITIL-branded APM Group scheme and marks the end of effective negotiations between APMG and EXIN/BCS-ISEB."
The key sticking point relates to the fear that there will be a reduction in the credibility and trust in the ITIL qualifications under the scheme that the APM Group proposes.
Mingay said it is difficult to assess this claim at this stage, but stressed that it is important for IT organisations to be aware that they will be faced with two competing training schemes and to "watch this space" closely for development.
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client is a well established, non profit organisation;...
PHP Web Developer – £30,000 - £35,000 PHP, MySQL, HTML...
HEAD OF DIGITAL - London - £80-95K + Excellent Bens...
Agile C# Developer - (North London) £55,000 - £65,000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
APMG will solve the the problem
I think with ISEB and EXIN working as sub-contractors for ITIL exam, there will be more consistency. The confusion now exists for the exam takers to which one to choose, then who offers each exam. The examination style for the two bodies is different and I don't think that the examinee wanted such variability to affect their credentials. I really want Sharon Taylor to produce a hybrid exam from the two bodies and keep both of them as accredited for its examination or clone one and let the other follow, but it would be unfair to reject their contract renewal. thanks; Mirgahni
Posted by: Mirghani M. 20 Nov 2006