20 Nov 2010
Microsoft gets plenty of heat from the consumer and enterprise IT communities for the reliability and security of its products. While the criticism is definitely warranted, there are also plenty of things Microsoft has done right in the 25-year history of its Windows operating system.
As you can see on V3.co.uk, we've been taking a long, hard look at Windows over the past 25 years. So, in true Top 10 style, we count down the best and worst things about the operating system that has come to define personal computing.
BEST
Honourable
Mention: DOS command line
Shaun Nichols: This one is fairly dated, as the command line
doesn't get much, if any, use from most people these days, but, up until Windows
95, this was a pretty useful feature.
A lot of those who used the early versions of Windows started on machines that ran MS DOS, or Microsoft Disk Operating System.
While the graphical user interface was preferable for many tasks, certain operations were just easier to do through a command line. For many, the ability to drop back into the command line interface was a huge time saver.
It's also an area where Windows was ahead of Mac OS. It wasn't until the release of OS X in 2000 that Mac users really had a command line interface option of their own.
Iain Thomson: I miss the command line interface. Yes, it was awkward and a foreign language to many, but that was part of the appeal. Show someone raised on a graphical user interface how to navigate via the command line, and it looked like black magic. But it gave computer users real control over their systems.
The DOS command line interface deserves a mention in what is ostensibly a Windows list because it was a part of Windows for many years, and is still something people default to in older versions of the operating system. For a certain generation of computer users, the command line is still king.
That said, very few of those old-timers are still using Windows. The command line is now almost exclusively a Linux interface, but many Windows users still miss it.
5.
Windows NT
Iain Thomson: NT was when Windows moved into the corporate
networking sphere big time. The personal computer business had outgrown the
corporate market in numbers, if not in value, some time before the launch of NT.
But when it came to office networks, the IT manager who didn't want to cause a
fuss went for a big platform vendor.
But for the IT administrator who was enthusiastic about networks and could work with Microsoft code, NT enabled the setup of a local network that did pretty much what a top-of-the-line system did for a fraction of the price.
It helped that the major computing economies, Europe and the US, were coming out of recession at the time. Companies were springing up in the desktop publishing and e-commerce fields that were short on funds but highly IT-centric, and NT fitted the bill.
NT also gave Microsoft a serious advantage over Apple. Yes, Apple did provide a limited networking capability but on large-scale networks Microsoft won on simplicity, if not on user experience.
Shaun Nichols: Windows NT was one occasion when Microsoft really knocked it out of the park. In addition to the great networking features, NT was renowned for its security and administrative capabilities.
The operating system helped to lay the foundation for many systems that are still in use today, and it also clued Microsoft into the idea that what works well in the enterprise space can be of use in the home as well.
Eventually, administrators and business users liked NT so much that Microsoft decided to make it the default platform for its operating system. From Windows 2000 on, NT was the basis for the entire platform.
Latest stories from Operating Systems
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
Working within the central Service Desk Team of a well...
GIS Applications Engineer - circa £35k Excellent opportunity...
Senior C++ Developer x 2 - Senior C++ Software Engineer...
We are actively searching for Information security specialists...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Very poorly researched
Let's see... The command line is still in all desktop and server versions of Windows. In fact, Microsoft released a newer, more powerful command line (Powershell) a few years ago, and you can now run Windows Server as just a command line. Windows 7 didn't take anything out of Vista. It has exactly the same system requirements, actually. In some specific cases, it will perform better than Vista on the same hardware, but you can usually get the same advantage using a clean install (see "Bundled Software"). Also, XP was long, LONG overdue for replacement. Say what you will about Vista, it was at least vastly more secure than XP. The poke at Zune is pretty undeserved. It didn't overtake the iPod, but it wasn't marketed nearly as hard either. It has taken the "not-iPod" market, though. That's no small achievement, considering how crowded that space is. Windows Phone 7 is doing better than Android was at the same time in its release cycle. Saying that a version 1 release (which, despite the name, WP7 very much is) is being outsold by an established product doesn't mean anything except for some very poor journalistic skills. While I'm at it, "Windows CE" isn't an OS, for phones or otherwise. It's a kernel, like XNU (kernel of OS X). It's actually still very widely used inside many types of device. Microsoft's old phone OS was called Windows Mobile, and is being phased out (deservedly).
Posted by: cbhacking 11 Dec 2010
Regime?
Hey buddy, unless you're making a joke about the fact that Microsoft is a convicted monopolist, you should probably refer to their patching REGIMEN, instead of their patching REGIME. Did you get receive journalism degree from a Cracker Jack box? Does this site have an editor?!
Posted by: Paul 03 Dec 2010
Command line
Miss the command line? I'm afraid rumours of the command line's demise... you know how that goes. I don't miss the command line, I use it every day in my Windows 7 installation. A command prompt window is one of the default windows I have open
Posted by: Sean 26 Nov 2010
VMS shurely
"Windows NT was one occasion when Microsoft really knocked it out of the park". Don't you mean "VMS"???
Posted by: Tom Welsh 26 Nov 2010
Good Old DOS
I'm 22 and only learnt MSDOS because a relative gave me an old computer when i was little, DOS 6.22 with a non working win 3.1 installation It worked out well, sending Batch (.bat) files that Deltree'd their computer (wiped it), modifying autoexec.bat on school computers.
Posted by: Lawrence 25 Nov 2010
Apples in Windows
Ironic isn't it that one of the reaons why people think Windows is good is because it provides a unified platform, whilst the same people deride Apple for insisting on, oh yes, a unified platform.
Posted by: MK22 24 Nov 2010
indeed
It doesnt happen often, but everything in this article seems to echo my own thoughts. ME and Vista were the biggest epidemics of the computer world, Microsoft stole all it's most characteristic features (and were late about it), W7 is at last something to reward our patience, and the sheer size and power of MS is it's best double edged sword. And yes, there remain features only a DOS prompt can do. I still have a copy of DOS 4 on diskette somewhere
Posted by: K Barad 22 Nov 2010