22 Nov 2008
Last week we profiled our choices for the top 10 chief executives in the technology business, so it's only fair that this week we give you a selection of the worst.
For every great chief executive who inspires staff and makes farsighted business decisions, there's usually two or three absolute stinkers who make life miserable for employees and shareholders alike.
In many ways this was a tougher list to write. There were a lot of names to
choose from, to be sure, but what distinguishes a bad chief executive from a
truly bad one?
Below you'll read about bosses riddled with ineptitude, destroying a company's
esprit de cours or just being so pig-headed that they refuse to accept
reality.
The end result is the longest and most detailed top 10 list we've ever written. There was something about the topic that really inspired us both to let it all out.
When you've sat though insanely optimistic PowerPoint demonstrations, interviewed management who lie through their teeth or just had to listen to overenthusiastic pitches, an article like this comes as something of a relief.
As ever, we've also added a couple of honourable mentions at the end, at least one of which may surprise you. Feel free to add your own choices in the comments section below.
Latest stories from Web
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client is a well established, non profit organisation;...
PHP Web Developer – £30,000 - £35,000 PHP, MySQL, HTML...
HEAD OF DIGITAL - London - £80-95K + Excellent Bens...
Agile C# Developer - (North London) £55,000 - £65,000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
What about CA?
The company was screwed up by last CEO and was quite a big one. Mmmm is vnunet going hand by hand with CA.
Posted by: mark 26 Nov 2008
Novell didn't sue SCO, SCO sued Novell
SCO sued Novell after Novell pointed out that SCO didn't actually own UNIX, and that they required Novell's permission to do things like sue IBM. Novell countersued and had SCO's complaints dismissed in summary motions, leaving only Novell's claims. Nonetheless, Novell is still, technically, the defendant in the suit and plaintiff only by counterclaim. SCO faces a similar situation in SCO vs IBM, with the bulk of their suit dismissed before trail and SCO being left as effectively the defendant in a lawsuit that they started with much fanfare.
Posted by: Stephen Samuel 23 Nov 2008