13 Mar 2008
The Open Rights Group has raised concerns over potential privacy violations caused by the Phorm advertising system.
The monitoring system analyses users' surfing habits and is proving increasingly popular with ISPs looking to more accurately target subscribers with advertising.
Talk Talk, Virgin and BT are all currently working with Phorm on a pilot basis.
However, the Open Rights Group is calling for a detailed explanation of the exact workings of Phorm to ensure that it complies with privacy legislation.
"Until we know exactly how Phorm works, and across whose networks our data will flow, speculation about the privacy implications will continue," said the organisation in a statement.
"Can ISPs' employment of Phorm comply with the Data Protection Act? Is intercepting traffic in this manner an offence under Section 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers [RIP] Act?"
Nearly 4,000 people have signed up to a Downing Street petition highlighting their worries.
Privacy advocates have suggested that Phorm may be in contravention of the RIP Act, which states that the interception of any transmission across a public telecoms network requires the explicit consent of users.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has also said that Phorm will be investigated.
"Phorm has provided written information to us about the way in which the company intends to meet privacy standards," said an ICO spokesperson.
"We are currently reviewing this information. We are also in contact with the ISPs which are working with Phorm and we are discussing this issue with them."
In response to the furore Phorm issued a statement denying any lack of compliance with privacy legislation.
"Our technology complies with the Data Protection Act, RIP Act and other applicable UK laws. Consumers are in control. They can switch the service off or on," the company said.
"Meanwhile the system does not know who they are or where they have browsed as it does not gather personally identifiable information, does not store IP addresses or retain browsing histories.
"We are currently in conversation with the Open Rights Group to meet with them and look forward to explaining how our technology sets a new standard in online privacy."
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Salesforce.com Consultants, both Functional or Technical...
Enterprise Data Architect required by reputable Banking...
SSIS, SSAS, MDX, OLAP, OLTP, Data Warehousing, Data Modelling...
Specialist IT service provider is looking to recruit...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
They do not keep your info??
If they do not keep track on your info, how do they know where to send the personalised advert?
Posted by: Bartman 14 Mar 2008
sell! sell! sell!
this thing is dead in the water, launched to early by a half cocked PR firm whipped up by the promise of creating a closed advertising market. based on an (illegal) automatic opt in which then would harvest most user activity with the aim of targeting advertisements and create an advertising arena which was controlled by the Internet Service Providers and the product manufacturers. Given that the success of this is dependent on the majority of subscribers being ill informed or stupid enough to not opt out and that the media is seeing through the spin this "adware from your ISP" is due the dropping and running it deserved. a dot com company, selling shares at 'fundraisers' at double the value before even launching a product which by its very nature involves the interception of private data, it seems astonishing that it got this far! still it was something of an inside job by the looks of it! pump n' dump? maybe, bad idea? definitely!
Posted by: salty dog 13 Mar 2008