07 Dec 2010

The government's desire to drive the rollout of superfast broadband across the UK is being undermined by an unwillingness to reform the business rates system for taxation on the deployment of fibre, according to the Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA).
The group generally welcomed the proposals outlined by culture secretary Jeremy Hunt on Monday, but argued that the tax on deployments could have a negative effect.
"Currently 'fibre taxes' are considered by many to be hindering small-scale network developments and slowing the rollout of superfast broadband across the country," said ISPA in a statement.
Tony Ballard, a digital media specialist at law firm Harbottle & Lewis, claimed that the government's refusal to reform this system gives major incumbents, namely BT, a huge advantage over other companies.
"The net effect of the rating system is that smaller companies competing with BT in laying fibre optic cable to provide superfast broadband in outlying areas (or indeed elsewhere) must carry an enormous handicap," he said.
"Inevitably, this makes it hard for them to come forward with competitive quotes, thereby leaving BT as preferred bidder and creating conditions conducive to a monopoly. This cannot be healthy for a developing market."
The current system means that larger telcos pay for deployments based on revenue, while smaller ISPs pay per kilometre.
Some operators have claimed that this effectively means that BT would have to pay £19 per kilometre of fibre, whereas smaller players would be looking at £750 per kilometre.
Aidan Paul, chief executive of Vtesse Networks, a firm singled out for praise by Hunt on Monday, argued in August that this approach needs an urgent overhaul.
"The government needs to get its message sorted on broadband. Do they want broadband investment or not?" he told V3.co.uk.
"They won't make any money from these changes [to fibre rates] as people like us won't invest and it will just stop final-third rollouts."
The monopoly argument was given extra credence yesterday when Ofcom confirmed that it will put a pricing cap on BT in certain areas of the country where the operator has an unfair significant market advantage.
V3.co.uk contacted BT but the firm had no official comment to make.
The government acknowledged the criticism of 'fibre taxes' in its proposal document but appeared to be happy with the status quo.
"It is not our role to decide who is liable for what under the business rates regime," the report notes. "Second, the existing rates regime has been tested in court numerous times and no ruling has required any change to the regime."
Latest stories from Government
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
SQL Server Developer - Our client, an international...
IT Technical Service Delivery Manager / ITIL / Reigate...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
High Speed Broadband = More Tax & High Speed Fines.
The whole exercise of increasing broadband speed is seriously flawed, as most ISP?s have a limited fair usage policy, even those ISPs who claim to give unlimited download still state a fair usage policy is in place usually a mere 10Gig capacity if you?re lucky. Hence by increasing the download speed the faster you reach your cap limit, before you either have restrictions placed on you and at worse loose your contract. To make matters worse there?s talk of Broadband Tax, which amounts to ?Tax upon Tax? as you are already taxed on you Internet Service Account. As usual ?Big Ideas Taxpayers Money? yet again, but no practicality from a proven incompetent Government who fails to understand even the basics of the Internet. Yet never fail to jump on an opportunity to create ?Revenue Scam Fines? from the use of the net. Pub fined $13k for Wi-Fi copyright infringement. Signed Carl Barron Chairman of agpcuk
Posted by: Carl Barron 07 Dec 2010