16 Nov 2007
Presidential hopeful Barack Obama has unveiled his technology strategy and is calling for an overhaul of the US patent system and the appointment of a national chief technology officer.
The policy states that Obama wants to upgrade the national internet network to next-generation broadband and put in laws to encourage open access for all.
He has also made clear his commitment to network neutrality, but it is his policies on patents that will raise eyebrows in Silicon Valley.
"By improving predictability and clarity in our patent system, we will help foster an environment that encourages innovation," the policy document (PDF) states.
"Giving the Patent and Trademark Office [PTO] the resources to improve patent quality, and opening up the patent process to citizen review, will reduce the uncertainty and wasteful litigation that is currently a significant drag on innovation.
"With better informational resources, the PTO could offer patent applicants who know they have significant inventions the option of a rigorous and public peer review that would produce a 'gold-plated' patent much less vulnerable to court challenge."
The other controversial plan is to appoint a national chief technology officer as a cabinet-level role.
The CTO would oversee the opening up of government communications to voters and will have a specific responsibility to ensure that government communications are opened up as much as possible.
Other plans include a re-examination of the wireless spectrum to see whether it can be used more effectively, a $10bn programme to digitise medical records and a reassessment of the speed limits for broadband, currently 200Kbps.
Obama unveiled the policy document before an official visit to the Google campus, becoming the seventh presidential candidate to do so.
After greeting employees on the site and in 40 remote locations he settled down for a fireside chat with Google chief executive Eric Schmidt.
Andrew McLaughlin, director of public policy and government affairs at Google, quoted some of the conversation in his blog.
"After a particularly open-ended first question ('What is it that you're going to do that's exceptional?'), Obama looked out and asked 'Is this the kind of interview that you guys went through?'" McLaughlin wrote.
"(The answer is 'yes', except we went through eight of them, and they focused more on how to sort 32-bit integers and less on how to counter the threat of global terrorism).'"
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Java / J2EE analyst programmer with experience of building...
Crystal Reports Developer London or Dublin £340 per day...
Our client is a major Broadcasting company seeking a...
Support Engineer required to work for leading Online...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
red herring
If Obama carries through these plans, he will do to the US Patent System what Bin Laden did to the World Trade Towers. All this talk of a need for patent ?deform? is but a red herring fabricated by a handful of large tech firms as a diversion away from the real issue...that they have no valid defense against charges they are using other parties' technologies without permission. It?s not about reforming the system. It?s about legalizing theft! The objective of these large firms is not to fix the patent system, but to destroy it or pervert it so only they may obtain and defend patents; to make it a sport of kings. Patents are a threat against their market dominance. They would rather use their size alone to secure their market position. Patents of others, especially small entities, jeopardize that. For example, the proposed change to eliminate the use of injunctions would only further encourage blatant infringement. Any large company would merely force you to make them take a license. They would have little to lose. Everything would be litigated to death -if a small entity can come up with the cash to pursue. That's what these large multinationals are betting against. Sadly, some legislators and other parties have been duped by these slick firms (Google, etc.) and their well greased lawyers, lobbyists (some disguised as trade or public interest groups), and stealth PR firms. Don't be surprised to find the Washington lobbyist scandal spreading into the patent deform proceedings.
Posted by: stv 16 Nov 2007