24 Jul 2006
A federal judge has denied motions by the US government and telecoms provider AT&T that sought to block a lawsuit centring on the the carrier's alleged cooperation in a government wiretapping programme.
The suit was brought forward last January by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which claims that AT&T illegally allows the National Security Agency to listen in on traffic on its network.
The US government was asking for a dismissal of the case because it could expose state secrets.
It argued that the wiretapping programme, if it exists, is a state secret. Additionally it was claimed that any evidence arising from the case would also be secret, so preventing AT&T from staging an effective defence.
The judge, however, ruled that the existence of the case is already common knowledge and by itself cannot be considered a state secret.
He proposed appointing an independent expert to determine whether evidence should be considered a secret.
The EFF praised the ruling. "Judge Walker correctly found that the government, after having already admitted to and extensively commented on the NSA's spying programme, cannot now claim that it is a secret and sweep AT& T's role under the rug," said EFF staff attorney Kevin Bankston.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
SOFTWARE ENGINEER - BERKS - to £34k plus package WAREHOUSE...
We currently have a position for a Senior Project Manager...
JAVA DEVELOPER TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS / TMS...
We are looking for an experienced Software Business Analyst...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?