02 May 2008
The White House has stated that it is unable to provide investigators with over five million emails relating to the run-up to the Iraq war because it has accidentally deleted them.
Campaign groups Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the National Security Archive filed requests in May for copies of emails from the White House relating to a number of issues, including the planning for the war in Iraq.
The White House has been fighting the case ever since and has now claimed that it cannot comply as the emails have been lost.
A court has now given the Executive Office of the President until 5 May to come up with a full account of its data backup strategy, and to clarify the status of backup tapes covering March 2003 to October 2005.
White House staff have offered contradictory claims that backup tapes have been overwritten.
"The court is reacting to the inconsistencies in the White House statements, " said Meredith Fuchs, general counsel at the National Security Archive.
"Emails are lost one day, the next they are not. Emails are recoverable, then they are not. Backup media is saved, then it is not.
"What worries us is that time is passing. There are only eight and a half months until this administration leaves office.
"If nothing is done soon not only could the emails disappear for good, but the federal records that are commingled with the presidential records could get swept away and become inaccessible for the next 12 years."
Some have questioned how it is possible that so many emails have gone missing from a government department.
The Executive Office of the President has previously said that the losses occurred while switching from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange when staffers were left to decide what to archive and what to delete.
"Given the technological advances of today's society, it seems a little archaic to leave the archiving of potentially sensitive and highly classified information in the hands of the end user, particularly for an organisation so firmly in the public spotlight," said Juergen Obermann, chief executive at archiving specialist GFT Solutions.
"While this throws up some serious concerns over internal policy it is more worrying that, by failing to archive all correspondence, the very body supposed to be upholding the law is clearly in violation of it."
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A senior C# developer is required by a leading investment...
A senior JAVA developer is required by a leading financial...
A leading investment bank are looking for an AGILE JAVA...
A senior C# WPF F# developer is required by a leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
convenient
HOW CONVENIENT, they had been fighting this case for awhile and then zap 5 million emails get deleted, what ever happend to their miraculous data recovery methods, or just another myth in their conundrum of lies. The signs of an awakening public perhaps.
Posted by: superman 04 May 2008
Been there, done that,,,
Having personally experience a Lotus Notes to Exchange migration, this is no surprise to me. Without going into techno-babble, all messages do not get converted reliably to the Exchange format, especially dealing with encrypted messages and archives. If you have a good pre-migration backup of the mail servers... it is not a trival task to extract those emails and provide them to another organization (I've done that too!). Those who are pointing fingers and complaining don't even have the slightest clue about what's invovled here....
Posted by: JS 02 May 2008
Have you ever worked with government admins...
To answer the question "how" wor with some of the people the government has a "technical" server admins. You're luck if they understand what email is let allone where. As for the decision of what to keep and not keep - it is standrad practice but they are supposed to maintain those in hardcopy or a Records Management system (FOIA) unfortunately they make it more complicated than it needs to be. It isn't the Bush adminstrations fault though, President Clinton had the same issues, except with him the hard copies were quickly marked as presidential records.
Posted by: Frank Franklin 02 May 2008