vnunet.com comment: Clive Longbottom on Vista upgrade woes - Part II

Clive Longbottom is service director at independent analyst firm Quocirca

It has been a little while since I decided to be brave and upgrade my ThinkPad laptop from Windows XP to Vista Ultimate, along with upgrading Office XP to Office 2007.

The upgrade to Vista was covered in an earlier article, but I thought that now would be the time to provide an update on my views and perceptions of Microsoft's operating system and the Office suite.

Firstly, the good news. Office 2007 is very good; the Ribbon does what it should and, although finding things can take a while to start off with, you soon get used to the new layout.

Overall I have felt that the experience is far more intuitive and is faster than the old menu system. I also find the suite faster than Office XP, and with fewer crashes on large documents.

Document fidelity in round-tripping between Office 2007 and Office XP/2003 seems to be fine, even with the number of document reviews that go on within Quocirca.

The free download of the PDF creator is faster than Adobe's and meets our basic requirements adequately.

Now to Vista itself. After having to stump up for double the memory, and after the amount of time spent in essentially rescuing a system that had hamstrung itself during upgrade, on the whole Vista is behaving itself.

The Gadget function is good, allowing me to keep an eye on the various newsfeeds and on resource usage (OK, Mac users - we know that you've had this since 1913 or whenever).

This is a fun one: rebooting the laptop shows how hard Vista is on resources, with both cores of the CPU being above 90 per cent for a couple of minutes, and memory usage being above 80 per cent.

Once everything is loaded and has calmed down a little, it trundles along at around 15 per cent per CPU core and around 55 per cent memory (remember that this a 2GB machine).