23 Sep 2008
A consortium of scientists and industrial firms has formulated a plan to build a 'space elevator' that would dramatically lower the cost of getting into orbit.
The Japan Space Elevator Association has published plans for the structure, which it estimates could be put in place for as little as $9bn.
The group believes that the project would revolutionise the cost of satellite communications systems, and make orbital manufacture economically feasible.
"Just like travelling abroad, anyone will be able to ride the elevator into space," Shuichi Ono, chairman of the Japan Space Elevator Association, told The Times.
The plan calls for the use of carbon nanotubes attached to a fixed platform in orbit and extending to a base station on Earth.
These would need to be about four times as strong as existing nanotubes but the strength of such materials has increased a hundredfold in the past five years.
Elevators attached to the tubes could be powered by electricity, dramatically reducing the cost of moving materials into orbit.
Orbital manufacturing has many advantages over Earth-based production, not least vast amounts of available solar power.
Nasa has already shown the ease of growing perfect crystals in zero gravity, and other exotic materials could also be produced more easily in such conditions.
In addition, the lower cost of getting into orbit would cut the cost of setting up satellite communications systems to those parts of the world where landlines are uneconomic.
The concept of a space elevator was first conceived by Russian rocket scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, but was popularised by Arthur C Clarke in his book The Fountains of Paradise.
Latest stories from Components
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A senior C# developer is required by a leading investment...
A senior JAVA developer is required by a leading financial...
A leading investment bank are looking for an AGILE JAVA...
A senior C# WPF F# developer is required by a leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Nothing Is Impossible
Yes, Newton's Third Law applies. But the project is still completely do-able. Since gravity cannot provide the centripetal force required for a structure that tall, it is possible to use a "fake" geosychronous platform that is held in place through cables, and the tension from those cables provides the required centripetal forces. Newton's Third Law, right there.
Posted by: Jimmy 20 Dec 2009
To writer above me....
they have a counter wait above the platform to stop this from happeing.. you dont think theyd just throw 9b onto a project they havnt thought through?
Posted by: kel 29 Jun 2009
great plan
I understand what you're doing but it will take extremely long to build and use
Posted by: Victoria 11 Mar 2009
You forgot...
You forgot, or rather this article's writer did, that for the elevator to operate there is also a counter weight, some distance into space, above the orbiting platform that keeps it up there. Any payload would have to exceed the mass of the counterweight and all the cable to actually have any effect on it.
Posted by: Dave 30 Sep 2008
Impossible
Newton's third law makes it impossible to move materials up to an orbiting platform for the simple reason that the act of an elevator pulling itself up will also pull the platform - which has nothing but it's own inertia holding it in place- down to Earth, and out of orbit. Note to Japan space elevator association: If you're going to blow a cool $9 bn on a pipe dream, at least choose one that has a vague chance of success.
Posted by: Satish Mallya 25 Sep 2008
ISS fiasco
I hope this project is well thought out, it should not be a fiasco like the International Space Station where after spending on it and building it there are plans of not prolonging it beyond 2010!!
Posted by: Priyanka 25 Sep 2008