02 Sep 2009
Senior management at VMware have indicated that the company is ready for a fight if Microsoft wants to take them on in the virtualisation sphere.
VMware chief executive Paul Maritz, speaking at VMworld 2009 in San Francisco, was blunt in his assessment of the challenge from Microsoft and how he intends to beat it.
"Obviously Microsoft is a serious competitor. Virtualisation is not easy to do and it takes significant effort," he said. "Microsoft has been working on Hyper-V for five years, and is at a stage we were at three years ago. The way you deal with competitors is by producing a better value than they do."
Microsoft has been seriously worried by the success of VMware. Last year it released its Hyper-V virtualisation software ahead of schedule and dramatically undercut the price of VMware's package.
Microsoft was also a sponsor of last year's VMworld conference, but was barred from doing so this year as VMware considers the firm a serious competitor.
Maritz is well versed in Microsoft's competitive tactics. He spent 14 years at the company and played a key role in the development of Windows and Internet Explorer.
VMware argues that Microsoft came to the virtualisation field too late and is too tied to the principle that the operating system is the binding force behind virtualised computing.
"That's been a historic Microsoft strategy, and in this case it works very clearly against customer interests," said Raghu Raghuram, vice president of server business at VMware.
"By definition it constrains the solution to be a very narrow partitioning solution that you add on to Windows as opposed to a datacentre solution. That's why we think that solution is flawed from the get-go.
"The other interesting aspect of this is that every security vulnerability that affects the Microsoft operating system by implication will require you to look at your Hyper-V environment to see if there is impact, as opposed to an operating system-independent solution."
Latest stories from Storage
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Key skills for this role include a comprehensive understanding...
Fantastic opportunity for an Information Security Professional...
VB.NET Developer / SQL / VB6 / ASP / XML / Cheshire...
Fantastic opportunity for a high calibre Security Architect...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Check Secunia.com for the last round of VMWare Vulnerabilities
Maybe VMWare is not OS centric but that doesn't make their products any less vulnerable, especially after considering this last large batch of patches for VMWare. http://secunia.com/advisories/vendor/300/ Sure go ahead and trust VMWare with your mission critical apps in a VMWare instance. You better have a good fail-over plan, else instead of losing one or two apps you lose a bundle to either HW failure or exploitation of the virtual layer.
Posted by: FDunn 26 Nov 2009