All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Dell forced to change terms and conditions

by Jane Hoskyn

10 Jul 2006

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this
Dell has pledged to change its terms and conditions after the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) received a high volume of consumer complaints
Dell is accused of including terms meant for business contracts in its consumer terms and conditions

Dell has pledged to change its terms and conditions after the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) received a high volume of consumer complaints. 

The world's biggest PC maker had been accused of including terms meant for business contracts in its consumer terms and conditions

For example, Dell disclaimed liability if consumers failed to confirm in writing any phone conversations about a dispute, or if they failed to tell Dell about any errors in an order. Dell also claimed limited liability for incorrectly priced products.

These terms should only be imposed on business customers. By applying them to consumers, the OFT considered Dell to be violating the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and the Distance Selling Regulations 2000

Following months of negotiation, Dell has now responded to the OFT's concerns by promising to "improve the transparency" of its terms, removing legal jargon and making it more clear which terms apply to consumers and which to businesses.

The move has been welcomed by consumer watchdog Which?. "Computing Which? welcomes the decision by Dell to change its terms and conditions to make them fairer to consumers," said editor Jessica Ross. 

Dell fared badly in a recent Computing Which? investigation into technology retailers. The report highlighted issues such as shops denying responsibility for faulty goods, refusing to provide refunds and misleading consumers on the shop floor.

"Of the complaints received, Dell came up as the worst offender," said Ross. "So we appreciate any work with the OFT to improve the consumers' position."

At the time of writing Dell has not yet reprinted its consumer customers' contracts or updated its website, where the contentious terms and conditions are still in place.

The page is headed: 'These Terms and Conditions are effective from 23.12.2002 until further notice.'

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

30%

1%

12%

57%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Principle Network Design Engineer

Key skills for this role include a comprehensive understanding...

Senior Information Security Consultant

Fantastic opportunity for an Information Security Professional...

VB.NET Developer Cheshire

VB.NET Developer / SQL / VB6 / ASP / XML / Cheshire...

Security Architect

Fantastic opportunity for a high calibre Security Architect...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.