15 Dec 2000
AOL has moved quickly to patch a severe security flaw in its AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) client - which also ships with Netscape Communicator.
Security firm @stake said the flaw could have allowed hackers, through malicious HTML email or a malicious website, to run code on users' machines if they had installed AIM, regardless of whether they were running it or not.
The weakness, a HTTP buffer overflow vulnerability, was described by @stake as "real easy to exploit".
Many corporate networks are understood to be included in the estimated 64 million users of the client. @stake warned that the bug may bypass corporate firewalls, because it is client initiated and most firewalls don't guard against this type of attack.
AOL has posted a patched version of the IM client at http://www.aol.com/aim/home.html, but eyebrows are likely to be raised at the apparent lack of publicity for the fix. However, AOL said it has received no reports of the flaw being exploited.
@stake warned that people are vulnerable unless they upgrade. A description of what users should do if they cannot easily upgrade can be found on @stake's website.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Key skills for this role include a comprehensive understanding...
Fantastic opportunity for an Information Security Professional...
VB.NET Developer / SQL / VB6 / ASP / XML / Cheshire...
Fantastic opportunity for a high calibre Security Architect...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?