27 May 2010
Privacy organisations have criticised the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) for failing to censure Google over its latest data violation, in which private Wi-Fi information was collected from homes and businesses.
Google had claimed that the information was collected by mistake in 2008, when its Street View cars were gathering photographs.
Information Commissioner Christopher Graham called on Google to delete the data, but declined to launch a further investigation despite the fact that Google's actions had breached the Data Protection Act.
Other European countries, including Germany, Spain, France, the Czech Republic and Italy, have opened up full investigations into the incident.
The European Privacy Association and Big Brother Watch said that Google's actions had shown a "disdain for privacy", and that the UK should also be investigating the amount of data Google holds about its users.
"Whether your Wi-Fi network is unencrypted or secured, anyone should be able to conduct their private affairs, be it online banking, shopping or checking email, safe in the knowledge that their personal liberty will not be compromised," said the organisations in a joint statement.
"If Google does not act in good faith and fully divulge the private information it has been accessing, a full investigation must be carried out."
Privacy International has also criticised the Information Commissioner for not taking a tougher stance, and has asked Google not to delete the data so that further investigations can take place.
The group described the guidance issued by the ICO to Google as a "collusion to destroy evidence".
Latest stories from Privacy
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
TFL director of Games transport Mark Evers discusses how the public transport network is preparing for this summer's event
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
Security Assurance Consultant ( CLAS ) with HMG and Information...
Solutions Design Architect - Oracle - Exadata - Dataguard...
My Client is a tier one investment bank based in Edinbugh...
Analyst Programmer Web Developer required to work for...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Do not let Google off the hook - what next will they do?
A firm wrap on "Googles" knuckles is definitely needed Why 1 - As the saying goes Give someone one an "inch" and they will take a "yard" - 2 - Google protect their IP and Brand religiously and with zealous with there staff - strange they let them add in own initiative which puts at risk their reputation i.e Senior management must have known or they promote a culture where "information" is a God and encourage individuals to find ways of getting it who do not appreciate privacy still is a mantra for some of us
Posted by: Tony Barrow 27 May 2010