24 May 2010
As expected, the IT sector has been targeted today as part of the £6bn public spending cuts (PDF) announced by chancellor George Osborne designed to help cut the budget deficit.
Osborne said that £95m in savings could be found in IT spending across all departments, but details of exactly which projects are to be cut or scaled back have yet to be disclosed by the individual departments which have been given the autonomy to do so by the Treasury.
IT providers had been braced for the cuts for some time, and their fears were confirmed after the government's pledge last week to "take steps to open up government procurement and reduce costs ".
Trade association Intellect was quick to react to the cuts, urging the government not to be short-sighted in axing IT spend.
"Although change programmes and technology have an upfront cost, they can deliver significant long-term savings and efficiencies that could make an appreciable difference to the UK government's structural deficit over the medium to long term," said Intellect associate director Sureyya Cansoy.
"Freeing frontline staff from administrative burdens using technology can mean that resources are used more efficiently without harming the quality of the service."
David Clarke, chief executive of the BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, similarly stressed the importance of IT in enabling efficiencies.
"IT underpins and enables the implementation of all government policies and programmes, and more effective use of IT is the only way the government has of reducing overall programme costs and improving efficiency," he said.
"It would be disappointing to see the critical role that IT and IT professi onals play in enabling the implementation of government efficiency savings and in developing the information society to slip down the government's agenda by the scrapping of some government IT projects."
Intellect's Cansoy added that the technology industry is keen to work with the government to help reduce the deficit, and urged a "do it once" approach which involves sharing services and reusing assets.
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Project Manager (BI) 6 Months Contract – to...
Desktop Support Manager 3 month contract - to start...
/ Programme Manager / 45k / Significant benefits / London...
Automation Test Manager Selenium London 75k Automation...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
How to cut IT costs much more
System implementation costs are typically more than twice that expected and this is without counting internal staff time. This can be greatly reduced by a more disciplined approach to using and documenting the old system first so you will know what you are doing and do not lose control with the new system.
Posted by: Dewey 01 Sep 2010
Specification of need is problem
As an engineer who has experienced IT in government service I found the main problem is that as funding is controlled by administrators they have a big influence on how IT is introduced. The number of professionals of all types in the service has been reduced every time the government requires savings. The result is that administrators call in consultants and give them a poor definition of the IT requirement and thus get the wrong solution. Curing this results in long delays and vast costs. If suitable professional expertise was available and used within the service the needs for IT could be met with great savings. Unfortunately I see that this reduction in investment will add to the inefficiency of the service. The choice will then be between the costs to the country of a failed service or the cost of repairing the damage this "saving" will create.
Posted by: misceng 26 May 2010
EA?
And why not? The public sector is possibly best placed to gain benefits from Enterprise Architecture practised at the highest-levels. Just look at the plethora of services and assets scattered around the public estates funded by the same taxpayer and you can just about imagine the wasted (not just IT) expenditure behind the scenes.
Posted by: Joseph George 25 May 2010