22 Jan 2002
Philips, the Dutch company which co-created the Compact Disc format along with Sony almost 20 years ago, is standing defiantly against the industry's use of copy-protected CDs.
The firm has warned that discs protected with such technologies could not be classed as compact discs and can't use the 'Compact Disc' logo that has been stamped on every CD since the format was developed.
Record labels are also being pressured by Philips to include warnings to consumers that copy protection techniques are used on a CD and may cause problems with some devices.
The big five record companies - Bertelsmann BMG, Vivendi Universal, Sony, EMI and AOL Time Warner - have been steadily introducing the controversial formats which prevent the copying or 'ripping' of CDs to MP3 since last year.
But Philips, which also governs the Compact Disc trademark, is refusing to follow suit under the acknowledgement that the introduction of such technology could do more harm than good.
Designed to protect the copyright of record companies in the wake of such technologies as Napster, which sparked a flood of copyright infringements, a variety of protection technologies have been tested on an uninformed public.
At the end of last year big stars such as Michael Jackson and Natalie Imbruglia came under fire from consumers when copy protection systems were used on their CDs without any warning on the packaging.
The UK release of Imbruglia's White Lillies Island album prompted numerous returns after it emerged that the quality and playability of the CD may have been impaired by copy protection technology.
It has come to light that a high number of these untried and untested technologies, such as Cactus Data Shield, not only prevent the CDs being read in a CDRom drive but cause problems on a number of standalone CD players.
The UK Campaign for Digital Rights (UKCDR), which is fighting against the proposed European Copyright Directive, our equivalent of the controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act, estimates that well over a million of these CDs have already been released in the UK alone, often with no visible warning.
Jim Peters, who heads up the UKCDR, has posted a warning on the group's website which says: "The record companies seem determined to keep going along this path. Universal, for instance, has said that it wants all of its CDs copy-protected within six months. We feel that they should not be allowed to get away with this."
He added that there were still unlabelled copy-protected CDs available to buy in the shops. "The public is still being lied to and misled. We want this issue to become common public knowledge so that the record companies can no longer get away with all these underhand tactics," he said.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Digital Account Executive Fulham, London 25k A great...
Our global consultancy client currently seeks a number...
Support Analyst x 1/2 Skills: Apple Mac OSX, Windows...
Network Consultant - London - 55-65k My client are...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
cd copy protection fraud
CDs containing Copy Protection on them are not only an infringement on the word CD, but completely do the opposite of what theyre supposed to do. In my case, I bought two CDs carrying the Copy Protection logo, and quickly came home to listen. First try was in the PC, it read but skipped around a lot like a badly damaged CD. Second try, my mac. Same. Third, my Philips CD player (just a CD player, not a computer!), same problem. In some cases whole tracks were skipped. To get around this problem was quite easy. I could: A, download the mp3s (which were available on the net), or copy the CD. Copying the CD is maximum quality was quite easy, making it possible to listen to the CDs the way they were intended, and not as a low rez compressed audio file such as an mp3. But I dont want to have to go through all this every time I want to buy a CD. Should I resort to piracy? Well record companies, your leading me to it! I WANT to buy the CDs and support my favorate artists! Marisa Monte, Im sorry but your new CDs dont work on my CD player, and Im not buying another one! Complain to EMI, then get back to me ;)
Posted by: jon 27 Sep 2006