11 Nov 2009
ISP TalkTalk has said that new EU telecoms regulations will make it impossible for media creators to push for suspected illegal filesharers and downloaders to be disconnected, without first proving guilt through an impartial legal process.
TalkTalk disputes business secretary Lord Mandelson's claims that it will be simple to remove filesharers and downloaders from the internet after nothing more than a couple of strongly worded warnings. In a statement the firm said that new EU rules on electronic communications would prevent this.
The EU has said that any measures taken against users must be done so with " due respect for the principle of presumption of innocence and the right to privacy... A prior fair and impartial procedure shall be guaranteed, including the right to be heard of the person or persons concerned". Lawyers working for TalkTalk believe this to be a blow against the government's plans.
Scott Fairbairn, a specialist in telecoms and intellectual property law at CMS Cameron McKenna, said, “The recently agreed wording in the draft EU Telecoms Package is clear. Rights holders cannot act as judge and jury in these matters. They cannot simply instruct ISPs to disconnect their customers or restrict their internet connections. In no way can that be considered to be a ‘fair and impartial’ procedure as article 1(3)a of the new Framework Directive demands.
“At the very least there would need to be some kind of independent and impartial tribunal to consider the merits of each case. If such an essential safeguard is not part of the UK measures then BIS would be in contravention of the new European law.”
Andrew Heaney, director of strategy and regulation at TalkTalk, which is running a campaign against the government plans, and has started a petition against them, added that nobody should be disconnected unless “it is established whether they broke the law through an impartial legal process starting with a presumption of innocence".
"The accuser has to prove guilt and if guilt is established then any penalty must be tailored to fit the individual circumstances," he added.
"Although the new rules are not yet UK law, we call on the government to respect the spirit of what is intended and to drop its draconian plans to disconnect users without a proper judicial process.”
Latest stories from Privacy
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Roc Search (ISEB, Automation, QA, Agile, Manual, Automation...
My Client is a reputable WORLD WIDE Systems Integrator...
My Client is a reputable WORLD WIDE Systems Integrator...
My Client is a well funded specialist in delivering secure...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
don't do what I do do as I say
Members of parliament missues exspenses, Flip,Drive while on mobile, and all this is ok. But get caught downloading dear dear.
Posted by: Jack 20 Nov 2009
Bring it on
Mandelson is trying to secure his job after labour loses this election - he will succeed. Pirates want a quick inexpensive flexible way to access information. As it happens it is copyrighted, very easy to share and evolution of internet has made it even easier. They will succeed. There is always another 3 ways. They want to disconnect me - bring it on. Ill take the government to court for infringing my human rights - starting with the right to a fair trial. Record companies are trying to resist the sweeping changes of internet and the lower profit margins it brings. They just want to drag somebody down with them in their ignorance. No its not right to pirate information - yes you[record companies] are welcome to join us in 21st century.
Posted by: Rob 20 Nov 2009
I think I hear the sound of one hand clapping
As usual our politicians hear but one voice. The voice of the powerful. Have they asked the "pirates"? Many users download througght sheer curiosity, seeking novelty and wondering what new software will do. Mr Mandelson would not buy a home (? expenses?) without looking around itwould he? So why do people have to buy before they try to find out they have wasted their money. Viva Le Shareware!
Posted by: P.Raper 15 Nov 2009
Fair punishment
Recently at the cinema I saw that the fines for copying films were in the region of ?250,000 and/or 5 years in prison. I;ve seen people doing less jai time for murder. Let's get some perspective on the punishment for file sharing, It's up to the rights holders to protect their product,
Posted by: Jim Owens 15 Nov 2009
Big Brother
Well done TalkTalk the Government does not have the total right to interfere with the freedom of the Internet nor the individual without right and proper cause. We are not pawns nor a republic. Freedom is and has always been the right of all British Citizens.
Posted by: Roy Grant 13 Nov 2009
TALK TALK
what effect would this have on contract with isp???? does this mean i am no longer bound by contarctual obligations ???has nobody looked at the implications of paying for a service you can not get are the Government going to reimburse the ISPs
Posted by: Shadowuser 12 Nov 2009