19 Aug 2009
Senior executives at Mozilla have argued that recent proposals by Microsoft to appease European Commission (EC) anti-trust regulators over the unfair bundling of Internet Explorer (IE) in Windows products do not go far enough.
After a series of back and forth moves, Microsoft agreed to present consumers with a ballot screen offering a choice of browsers. Users would then pick one to install as their default browser.
However, Mozilla general counsel Harvey Anderson wrote in a blog posting that modifications need to be made to the ballot screen solution, which the EC seems close to accepting.
Anderson claimed that, at present, the ballot screen will be presented only to "users who have set IE as their default web browser", but nothing is mentioned about those who bought PCs with IE pre-installed.
He also recommended that Microsoft should be forced to work with browser vendors directly in an informal group including the EC to iron out ballot implementation problems and address what Mozilla sees as a bias towards IE in the current solution.
"IE may become the default by being selected. It may also become the default if the user simply ignores the ballot," Anderson wrote. "It may also become the default if the user is unable to figure out how to use the ballot. Finally, it may become the default even if the user expresses a desire to try one of the other browsers but fails to achieve an alternative browser install."
Anderson also expressed concerns that, even if a user chose and successfully installed an alternative browser as default, IE would still "occupy prominent real estate on the Desktop and Start Menu".
"The other browsers do not have this luxury and the advertising opportunity it provides merely through placement," he added.
Any solution must be evaluated over time to determine whether it is making a difference to the market and user behaviour, said Anderson in closing.
"The ultimate success of the proposal, however, will depend on Microsoft's long-term commitment to realise not just the words of the proposal, but its spirit, so a lot still remains to be seen," he wrote.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Our client, a leading IT services and consulting organization...
Midweight PHP Developer // LAMP // HTML // CSS...
My client a leading global financial company is seeking...
QA Test Analyst – Selenium RC – Java – Automation – Bug...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
You DH!
Yeah, that's you bozo. So dump Mozilla, nobody cares but you. The fact is that M$ has been abusing its monopoly for so long that they feel they have a right to do so. They were fairly proven to be monopoly mongrels but improperly dealt with. They should be forced to remove IE across the board. Separate & disperse them completely & while at it do the same to their Office software.
Posted by: Rex Alfie Lee 21 Aug 2009
So who's the bully now?
I'm so tired of Mozilla's unreasonable demands that I'm actually considering uninstalling their browser. They like to label microsoft as a monopolist thug and although there is truth in that statement it is ironic that mozilla has itself become quite the bully. They clearly wont be happy until Microsoft volunteer to completely replace all copies of IE with firefox in every windows installation.
Posted by: Tim I 19 Aug 2009