26 Nov 2009
Internet service provider TalkTalk has renewed calls for the government to reassess its Digital Economy Bill, arguing today that widespread public outrage over the legislation is growing.
Andrew Heaney, executive director of strategy and regulation at TalkTalk, told V3.co.uk at a Westminster eForum on the Future of Broadband in the UK, that the popularity of TalkTalk's Don't Disconnect Us petition on the government's number10.gov.uk web site proved his point.
The petition has received over 24,000 signatures since it was set up, making it the sixth most popular on the site.
"The amount of people who have signed the petition shows the strength of feeling that exists in all sectors on this Bill, from ISPs like ourselves to academics and notable celebrities like Stephen Fry who promoted the petition on his Twitter page," he said.
"The Bill is not something TalkTalk believes is a good thing, as it will increase costs to our customers and means we may have to unfairly remove customers from our service."
Heaney was referring to the controversial three-strikes disconnection policy proposed by Lord Mandelson.
The government should listen to the feedback it is getting to the Bill from these areas, Heaney said, and "act accordingly and reassess the Bill".
Heaney also noted that he had heard rumours that the Secti on 17 amendment, which would give any future secretary of state the ability to change copyright law, was to be removed.
"It may well be the case that the Section 17 amendment was always something of a sacrificial lamb in the Bill, but even so it's important that it is removed. However, there are lots of other elements of the Bill that need to be considered for dropping too, not just Section 17," he said.
Latest stories from Web
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Oracle E-Business Analyst / Functional Consultant - Supply...
SAP consultant Production: SAP MM, IM, PP, APO, Brussels...
Full time DBA with 5-10 years experience will be preffered...
Software Development Manager - Scottish Borders Agile...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
definatley No
Why should we accept this just the same as the 50p levy on phones, we have had enough for paying to keep the goverment in the luxry they enjoy, enough is enough why should we be restricted on what we get on the Internet.
Posted by: Mark Ditchburn 29 Apr 2010
Just Say NO
26,389 and counting. We have to send this legislation back to the fevered minds that created it. The internet has to remain impartial. The government can not say everyone should have access to the internet then add the reservation 'but only if you do as we say'. People who break the law should be punished but that is for a court to decide.
Posted by: The GreenWire 28 Nov 2009