05 Aug 2010
Salesforce and Microsoft have agreed an out-of-court settlement on a patent conflict concerning software used by customer relationship management applications.
Microsoft had sued Salesforce regarding certain menu and interface components, claiming that they infringed on Microsoft's intellectual property. Salesforce countersued, arguing that .Net and SharePoint infringed on its patents.
The two companies have now agreed a deal under which the disputed patents will be licensed to each other. In addition Salesforce will pay an undisclosed sum to Microsoft to reflect the strength of its patent portfolio.
"We are pleased to reach this agreement with Salesforce to put an end to the litigation between our two companies," said Horacio Gutiérrez, corporate vice president and deputy general counsel for intellectual property and licensing at Microsoft.
"Microsoft's patent portfolio is the strongest in the software industry, and is the result of decades of innovation.
"Today's agreement is an example of how companies can compete vigorously in the marketplace while respecting each other's intellectual property rights."
Latest stories from Software
Related videos
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Key skills for this role include a comprehensive understanding...
Fantastic opportunity for an Information Security Professional...
VB.NET Developer / SQL / VB6 / ASP / XML / Cheshire...
Fantastic opportunity for a high calibre Security Architect...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?