13 Jun 2007
Apple might choose a retail-only strategy when it launches its iPhone in Europe, as operators are complaining about the firm's arrogant demands.
"Operators consistently told us, not for attribution, of course, that they had spoken to Apple and found the company 'unbelievably arrogant', making demands that 'simply cannot be justified no matter how hot the product is'," Avi Greengart, a principal analyst at Current Analysis, wrote in an advisory on Monday.
"Several [operators] were adamant that they will never offer the iPhone."
The operators did not disclose to Greengart what demands Apple had imposed on European operators, he said in a phone interview.
Apple is preparing a US iPhone launch on 29 June. The company has previously promised a European release in the fourth quarter of this year.
In the US the device will be available only through mobile provider AT&T, previously known as Cingular. Apple has previously said that it is looking for a single partner for the entire European market.
Greengart suggested that Orange would be well suited to offer the iPhone, because it is the only operator that has significant Edge coverage in Europe.
The first version of the iPhone will feature an Edge radio, but lacks 3G capability. Edge is commonly referred to as 2.8G because it offers slightly slower data transaction rates that 3G.
Instead of partnering with an operator, Apple could opt to sell the iPhone through its existing dealer networks or partner with specialised mobile phone retailers such as Carphone Warehouse which has subsidiaries throughout Western Europe.
If Apple decided to sell the iPhone directly to consumers, it would have to sell the devices without simlock, allowing the buyer to insert their own Sim card.
This is not an option for the US market because several providers do not use Sim cards, and because operators use different network standards that prevent the iPhone working on some networks.
But going operator-free would pose a new challenge for Apple because the phone relies on the provider to power features such as the visual voice mail.
This allows the user to view and select the sender of a message, instead of having to listen to the entire queue of left messages.
This would force Apple to host voicemail or seek an outside partnership to bypass the voicemail services offered by operators.
Latest stories from Communications
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Firm also discusses Blackberry 10 system
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Software Project Manager, Bristol, up to £35k Want...
Front-end Developer / Web Developer - Tech Start...
Senior Ruby on Rails Developer - Leading Financial Technology...
MS CRM / Dynamics CRM Lead Technical Consultant, £58...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
They should know arrogance when they see it
The provider networks are complaining about Apple's "arrogance"? That's rich! This is an industry that has built a business model centered around vacuuming every last dime out of a customer's pocket for a service that has increasingly become a necessity. Apple comes along and challenges that model and they get their knickers in a twist, so they spin it as being about Apple's attitude. You don't have to be an Apple fanboy to see the hypocrisy behind this little screed.
Posted by: carrollw 15 Jun 2007
Heh
Yeah - about time the operators get a taste of arrogance themselves? I think some of them will come around eventually - but it will shake up the market even further if Apple goes with a no subscription model... And if they are even remotely successful with that, more producers will adapt that for the more high end phones - meaning gradually less binding, and less power to the companies that gave arrogance a face in the first place...
Posted by: PSJ 13 Jun 2007