17 Jan 2006
The House of Lords yesterday inflicted three defeats on the government over its proposal for national ID cards.
The Lords voted by 237 votes to 156 for a resolution demanding that the National Audit Office justify its estimate of the costs of such a scheme. A parallel study by the London School of Economics had suggested that the cost of the cards would be three times the government's estimate.
"Amendment number one returns to the issue of the costs of the ID cards scheme," said the Conservative Baroness Noakes, who introduced the amendment.
"Our committee stage was unusual in that we failed to get any useful information despite spending several hours on the matter. In fact, our only achievement was to establish with more precision what the government would not tell us about costs."
In the second vote the government was defeated on an amendment which required a secure method of storing the personal data recorded on the card.
"There is, as this House knows, widespread public concern over the facts to be gathered under the Bill," said Baroness Seccombe, shadow minister for home affairs and legal affairs.
"I am in full agreement with that concern, which is not confined to the accuracy of the information, vital though that is. The facts must, indeed, be accurate and up to date, but they also need to be secure from theft and misuse.
"We are all aware of the growing problem of identity theft and fraud and the importance of keeping personal information safe and private."
Latest stories from Privacy
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Software Developer / Web Developer (C# ASP.Net) – Leeds...
Required for my Market Leading Client. The position requires...
PHP Web Developer - Nottingham - £20K My client is...
IT Trainer / E-Learning Designer - London - This leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
They are right to reject it.
The Lords are right to reject the bill as it has not been clearly analyzed. In my opinion all data relating to an individual should be held on the crad protected under both public and secret key encryption, thus enabling only those authroized to update the card and those authorized to view limited sections of the card (not all). This way the privacy of identity is preserved, their is no Big brother database (which would never work as it would collapse under its own weight), the individual has control of their data by holding the card. Identity theft could also be reduced significantly by encrypting the picture of an individual on the card using a private government key (cannot change it unless you have access to the private key). the technology is there but teh government does not seem to, or wish to, use it correctly.
Posted by: Jeff Davis 17 Jan 2006