02 Dec 2005
Since the RIAA began its policy of suing file sharers the organisation has issued 14,800 lawsuits in the last two years, but none of the cases have ever come to court.
But now it looks like these legal threats will be challenged as Patricia Santangelo, a mother of five from New York, will become the first person to fight the case in court. She claims that the downloading was committed by a friend of one of her children and as such she is not liable.
"I am still nervous about the whole thing," she told her local paper, the Journal News.
"I just got so aggravated about how threatening they were."
She points out that she'd never even heard of the Kazaa software used to download the music and that the user name on the software belonged to one of her children's friends. The RIAA is demanding $7,500 for copyright violation.
Her lawyer, Morlan Ty Rogers, told the paper that the case against her was very weak.
"Many of these lawsuits have been brought against people who are simply the names on the internet account," Rogers said.
"It's really surprising" no one has attacked the record companies' basis for the lawsuits, he said, "because the record companies' claims are actually very weak."
The RIAA has become something of a hate figure among computer users for its use of legal challenges. Legal cases have been bought against children, students and even dead people.
Latest stories from Law
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
IT Security Specialist Move in2 Solutions /Pre-Sales...
SOFTWARE ENGINEER - BERKS - to £34k plus package WAREHOUSE...
We currently have a position for a Senior Project Manager...
JAVA DEVELOPER TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS / TMS...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Why should the user be held liable
Rather than holding the general populus liable for utilizing free software that is intended for pirating software, music, games, etc. Hold the companies liable. They know full well that their P2P Software is going to be used in an unlawfull manner, but are they held responsible, HELL NO. The internet and software used to take advantage of the internet is an ever evolving beast and trying to leash those who are simply using the technology available to them is totally retarded. Its like locking up an addict and telling the dealer to continue dealing. No matter what anyone does to stop P2P Sharing or any other file sharing programs is going to fail misserably. Leave us alone and go after the companies with the money! We're just using the free software that was made available to us!
Posted by: capsulecore 05 Dec 2005
RIAA Protects Rip Off Pricing!
It's about time. Everyone knows these lawsuits by the RIAA etc are more to do with Big Business wanting to continue to overcharge for production of CD's and DVD's. The artists get very little from each CD sale, whilst we get stung. Production costs have got to be less than £2 pounds sterling per CD. If the retail cost of CD's was uniformally low, then no one would bother pirating, or downloading, but go out and buy their own copy. CD sales would then rise ...
Posted by: J Rex 05 Dec 2005
ABOUT DAMN TIME!
Its about time someone fought back! Tired of seeing the RIAA getting away with all this! RIAA BACK OFF!
Posted by: »¤|¥|iss¤«·¤(`·Täñýå·´)¤· 03 Dec 2005