07 Jul 2006
A poll by security firm Sophos of more than 500 IT professionals has found a 50:50 split over the extradition of Gary McKinnon.
The online poll follows last night's announcement that Home Secretary John Reid has approved McKinnon's extradition to face charges in the US.
Asked whether it was right that McKinnon should face a US court, 52 per cent of respondents said 'no' and 48 said 'yes'.
McKinnon, who is to appeal his extradition, said that he was surprised by the result. "I think half the IT professionals are software security vendors," he told vnunet.com. "It is Sophos, after all."
Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, said: "It is fascinating to see how the IT community is split down the middle regarding Gary McKinnon. Many have expressed sympathy and think the British authorities have let him down.
"Hackers should take heed of the McKinnon case, and think carefully about their actions if they don't want a one-way ticket to an American court."
McKinnon, 40, maintains that he did not break into the networks with malicious intent, but to uncover confidential information about extraterrestrial technology.
He told vnunet.com earlier this year that he and his lawyers fear that he may be imprisoned as a terrorist in Guantanamo Bay.
Meanwhile Tory MP Boris Johnson has been blogging about the case. In a post dated 6 July, Johnson backs McKinnon and criticises the Labour government for not protecting its citizens.
"It cannot be right that British citizens should be handed over so casually. [Prime Minister Tony] Blair should intervene and put this unjust and one-sided treaty on hold. America defends its citizens, so why don't we defend ours?" he wrote.
"When the people of Britain choose a government, they assume that the government can be relied upon to negotiate treaties that preserve the liberties of British people, and prevent them from being arbitrarily hoiked off to face trial in foreign jurisdictions.
"Insofar as there is a case to defend, the evidence is all on this side of the Atlantic. You would therefore expect the case to be heard in this country, and yet no UK authority has shown the slightest interest in prosecuting. Not the police, not the Crown Prosecution Service, not the Serious Fraud Office."
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
Orange and Intel talk us through the ins and outs of their San Diego smartphone
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
Are you looking for a new positing within the Testing...
A leading global provider of critical information to...
Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...
Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Save Gary
Gary is being made an example, he discovered evidence to their little secret. Don't believe in conspiracy and coverups by governments? how about 9/11 and this fake war on terror? Speak up for Gary or he may be branded a "terrorist" the convenient knew way to silence anyone.
Posted by: concerned 09 Jul 2006
hacker
have you not realised the goverment in the u.k. do not give a damn about there citizens at home let alone abroad "phoney blair just sucking up to george again and look where the world is now . if the law was broken with this guy hacking into the "system" then let the uk courts deal with him !!! disgraceful
Posted by: john brown 08 Jul 2006
Like it matters
Poor little Brit, stuck on a spit, going round and round. Intentionally intruding into areas foreign in search of little green men. Though no where near Demark, the whiff of 'rottenness' is notably distinct. Whether 'loser' or 'liar' it matters not a whit. At 40 this whackjob is neck deep into it. Banish him to a annals of idiocracy and email away the key. He'll spend year after year in gaol as a Mitnick wanna be.
Posted by: Hue Mann 07 Jul 2006
Boris is more than right
The Home Secretary has in recent weeks refused to deport hijackers,murderers,fraudsters etc back to their own countries on the basis that their human rights would be violated. Yet it seems he has no problem in deporting a British citizen to face a kangaroo court in a foreign country, where from countless examples he will not get anything closely resembling a fair trial. If he was engaged in anything illegal, then it was in the UK, and he should stand trial in the UK. Given that murderers in the UK get out of jail in a couple of years with the blessing of the home office, then it follows that if he is facing 70 years in jail for a victimless crime his human rights are being more than violated. The US needs to get over this knee jerk reaction to any, and all perceived threats and get down to securing it's own computer system's and not look red faced for a scapegoat.
Posted by: David Wallace 07 Jul 2006
Like for like.
When the UK wanted suspected IRA Terrorists sent back to Northern Ireland during the Troubles American judges declined saying that they would not get a fair trial. I would put up a similar argument in favour of McKinnon staying here. Let Britain try him but not a foreign power.
Posted by: Ted Sloan 07 Jul 2006