All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis

Bug watch: The real danger of mobile viruses

by Jack Clark, Network Associates

01 Sep 2000

Be the first to comment

  • Tweet this

Bug Watch: Each week vnunet.com asks a different expert from the IT security world to give their views on recent virus and security issues, with advice, warnings and information on the latest threats. This week's expert is Jack Clark, business development manager at Dr Solomon's, a division of Network Associates.

This week saw the arrival of the Liberty program, highlighting again the threat of a virus attack on mobile devices.

'PalmOS/LibertyCrack' is the first Trojan Horse (a specific type of malicious code) to attack a wireless environment. Disguising itself on websites as an enabler for the popular gaming application Liberty, users run what they think is access software for the game, but instead invite the Trojan onto their devices. Once infected, the Trojan has the potential to delete all applications on a personal digital assistant (PDA).

But before we all start reaching for the panic button, it must be made clear that if you are using your PDA correctly, all information and applications stored in the device can be reinstalled via a PC, so no long-term damage is done.

However, although Liberty could be seen as a relatively inoffensive piece of code, it represents a far greater threat. It is one more proof point, one step further down the line - a warning shot as to the real danger of mobile viruses.

There is apathy towards mobile virus code among vendors and ebusinesses alike. Mobile viruses are perceived as a pest at very most, and the jury is still out on the potential havoc they are capable of causing.

One thing is for certain though, mobile devices and operating systems are firmly on the agenda of virus writers all around the world who relish the challenge of entering the mobile market.

In order to predict the future we need to look as the past. How many organisations realised the importance of antivirus software after being hit by Melissa? How many more still hadn't learnt their lesson when the Love Bug struck earlier this year?

In ebusiness, being wise after the event is a painful and costly process, yet it seems to be the most popular choice for most companies where virus attacks are concerned.

The subject of viruses is an emotive one, capable of creating a great deal of concern. Too many alerts, and antivirus vendors are branded scaremongers; too many attacks, and they're considered ineffective.

But where there is new technology, there will be people trying to exploit its weaknesses as well as its strengths. As convergence becomes a reality, and mobile devices are able to house more and more sensitive information, the threat of malicious mobile virus code increases.

By keeping companies aware of the potential threat which these viruses pose, and of new developments as they occur, maybe we can stop learning the hard way.

Next edition: 8 September

Do you agree?

 

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions. Your comment will be moderated before publication.

Poll

Flame virus poll

Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?

31%

1%

12%

56%

Connect with V3.co.uk

Sign up to our daily or weekly newsletters

Symanteccloud

Social networking: a guide for IT managers

Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them

Riverbed

Mitigating the risks of IT change

The importance of understanding your infrastructure

Test Architect

Are you looking for a new positing within the Testing...

B2B Marketing Executive

A leading global provider of critical information to...

Scrum Master

Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...

Interactive & Mobile QA Engineer

Want to work for one of the most dynamic, creative environments...

To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.