Analysis: Experts urge caution on cloud computing

Cloud computing offers a low cost alternative to buying and maintaining a computer infrastructure

A number of leading authorities have been urging caution on the adoption of web-based services as a new wave of vendors unveil cloud initiatives.

Cloud computing involves computing resources hosted in an off-premise 'cloud' rather than an in-house computer room.

The system offers organisations a low cost alternative to buying and maintaining a computer infrastructure and allows users to access the applications anywhere and anytime.

However, the advantages are now accompanied by growing concerns over data privacy, regulation and interoperability issues.

A number of vendors have announced cloud computing offerings in recent weeks, notably Amazon, Google and Oracle, and this was closely followed by IBM's launch of new social networking tools called Bluehouse.

The launches have spurred warnings from analyst firms which advise businesses to adopt such offerings with care.

Consultancy Global Secure Systems (GSS) said that organisations should review their IT security arrangements before jumping, even on a trial basis, into the world of cloud computing.

GSS managing director David Hobson pointed to provisions in the Data Protection Act that oblige companies to state clearly where they are storing customer data. The legislation also means that companies cannot store their data outside the European Union.

The problem with signing up to a cloud computing vendor is that company data could be stored almost anywhere in the world, particularly because vendors need to replicate the data around the world to maintain their own disaster recovery and backup plans, said Hobson.

"Our caution here at GSS doesn't reflect on the integrity of these new cloud computing services in any way," he said. "It merely reflects the fact that corporate governance rules and, of course, data protection legislation needs to play catch-up with the real world."

Richard Stallman, founder of the GNU project and the Free Software Foundation, voiced more grave concerns about allowing a third party to host private data. He advised organisations to keep private documents in their own hands "for your freedom's sake".

Stallman also noted flexibility issues stemming from organisations being locked-in to a particular cloud vendor. "If you do your computing using someone else's server, the server operator has control over it," he told vnunet.com.

"It's just as bad as running a proprietary program, and worse, because even the painful option of patching the binary is impossible."