All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis
|
|
|
10 Jan 2006
A US legal amendment has made it an offence to annoy anyone anonymously over the internet.
President Bush signed the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, which includes a clause on 'cyber-stalking'.
This amends existing telephone harassment laws and extends them to the internet, providing a maximum two-year jail sentence for anyone using use the web "without disclosing [their] identity and with intent to annoy".
Civil liberties groups have vowed to fight the legislation in the courts under the First Amendment, claiming that it would make it impossible for whistleblowers to operate without putting themselves at risk.
Clinton Fein, a South African activist who runs Annoy.com, was scathing about the new law.
"It appears that one is guilty of a crime if one were simply to 'utilise' a telecoms device 'with intent to annoy' a person regardless of the content or even in its absence," he said. "A conduct rather than a content crime; perhaps waving a BlackBerry in someone's face."
Latest stories from Telecoms
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
My client is a well established, non profit organisation;...
PHP Web Developer – £30,000 - £35,000 PHP, MySQL, HTML...
HEAD OF DIGITAL - London - £80-95K + Excellent Bens...
Agile C# Developer - (North London) £55,000 - £65,000...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
true dat
its our right to annoy people so get over it
Posted by: dominique runyan 20 Nov 2008
The Outlaw Blogger
Our country very much owes its existence to the anonymous pamphleteer. It is hard for me to understand how our lawmakers could be so out of touch with the elements of freedom of expression that have enabled our political freedom. Whatever perceived need Sen. Arlen Spector had for inserting this provision into a finance bill, legislative efforts should have been directed at a criminal act not "anonymous annoying".
Posted by: Penheaded 10 Jan 2006