16 Jun 2008
Gary McKinnon, the UK systems administrator who hacked into Nasa and Pentagon computers in 2001 and 2002, is today making a last-ditch bid to avoid extradition to the US.
If McKinnon's appeal is rejected by the House of Lords, the former hacker faces a possible life sentence.
The indictment accuses McKinnon of perpetrating "the biggest military computer hack of all time" from his bedroom in Wood Green, London.
He is alleged to have gained unauthorised remote access to numerous US-based computers, including those of Nasa, the US Department of Defense and the US Air Force, Army and Navy.
McKinnon is fighting extradition on the grounds that, although he admits accessing some the computers, he was not a threat to security and was looking only for information about UFOs, antigravity and free energy technology.
Lawyers acting for McKinnon insist that he has become a convenient scapegoat for appalling lapses in US military security.
McKinnon says that he broke into the Pentagon's computers using a simple script that looked for access ports which retained manufacturers' default passwords.
McKinnon, also known by his online name 'Solo', admitted to an audience at security conference Infosec in 2006 that he was discovered only because he misjudged time zone differences and started using remote control software on a PC when its user was sitting in front of it.
He portrays himself as a "bumbling hacker".
US prosecutors claim that McKinnon disabled a network of 2,000 US Army computers based in Washington for 24 hours and, shortly after 11 September 2001, shut down 300 computers belonging to a US Navy weapons station.
In US judicial style, prosecutors have tried to strike a plea bargain with McKinnon. If he pleads guilty to two of the charges, he will receive a sentence of four years or less.
If he continues to protest his innocence he could face up to 70 years, according to his solicitor.
McKinnon was first arrested in 2002 by the UK's National High-Tech Crime Unit under the Computer Misuse Act, but the Crown Prosecution Service refused to charge him. Later that year he was indicted by US prosecutors.
It was not until 2005, when the UK and US signed a new extradition treaty, that the US began proceedings against him.
McKinnon then became subject to bail conditions. He was not allowed access to the internet via a computer, and had to check in to his local police station every day.
He has never been charged in the UK.
A decision from the Lords is expected in three weeks.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Sneak peek at the forthcoming glass-based machine
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Skills: OO Development, Scripting, Functional My client...
Agile Java Developer - Media - London Key Words: Agile...
Technical support Specialist (2/3 rd Line) CCNA...
Functional Test Engineers needed, Berkshire, up to £30k...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
American Legal System is defective
Our legal system may not be the greatest, but the American System is total rubbish. For example a drug dealer plea bargains and gets a very short sentence, while the owner of the premises he dealt from, without her knowledge, gets twenty years for allowing the dealing to take place on her premises. This is not justice. The fact that WAmerica can extradite Britons but we cannot extradite Americans is not justice either. This man should not be extradited.
Posted by: John from Suffolk 20 Jun 2008
This is how it should proceed...
Hundreds of former and current members of the US military & astronauts all claim to have worked with or seen UFO technology. Gary McKinnon claims he found evidence of that on Pentagon servers. If that turns out to be accurate the relevant US goverment officials should be put on trial, and McKinnon given a knighthood. If he is found to be malicious hacker then the relevant court proceedings should go ahead in the US, but a trial must first take place in the UK. Where the US will be able to put forward their case and evidence but must include all evidence of UFO technology to the court with former military UFO witnesseses & scientists who claim to have worked with the technology being allowed to testify should the need arise. The US evidence showing malicious intent should be scrutinised and not just assumed to be completely accurate without doing so. If determined by the UK court that the US is hiding information on UFO technology, McKinnon will be vindicated in his efforts to attempt to discover this by hacking into a poorly secured system that his effort to do so can hardly be called hacking. Following this either minor charges or none at all will sound appropriate. Further proceedings should then be taken by the UK goverment and other goverments into disclosing the technology to solve the world's energy problems, and a failure to do so should be defined as a crime against humanity.
Posted by: John 18 Jun 2008
Mr. McKinnon is a world hero.
The truth about UFOs has been kept for too long. Mr. McKinnon is just a US treat against people who want to disclose the truth. Mr. McKinnon is a world hero.
Posted by: Sylvain Pimpare 18 Jun 2008
In Defense- Able! oh, really?
the Defense dept should be grateful to McKinnion for alerting them to their weaknesses- and are damn lucky he's not a terrorist. he could easily have done serious damage...let him stay in the UK.
Posted by: Ira 17 Jun 2008
No, no, no, no
What was the government doing ratifying such a treaty that allows the extradition of UK citizens to the US while not allowing the extradition of US citizens to the UK. Screw the US fascists, screw the UK government, time for another "glorious revolution" no doubt. Specifically on McKinnon, sounds more like a script kiddie to me, one must wonder how many times the security of these places must have been broken undetected due to the incompetence of the American military....
Posted by: Alexander 16 Jun 2008
STUFF THE YANKS
The americans are a law unto themselves when it suits them .If they want to make an issue of this they shouldnt live in a glass house !
Posted by: grahama 16 Jun 2008
Stupidity can send you to jail for life!
It would appear that McKinnon is guilty of a series of goofs which has made the great US of A look stupid. He will know the truth of this and, IMHO, he would do well to take the plea bargain of around 4 years. The alternative is life in a US jail for showing the world what crass idiots the US Forces are. No contest in my view.
Posted by: Miguel 16 Jun 2008
Perhaps they even left the standard 'Welcome' messge
I wonder if the standard welcome messages were in place on the systems that were 'hacked'. Many default installs of systems & services came along with default passwords and welcome messages back when the 'hack' took place. If the standard welcome messages were in place, then it could be argued that in fact no offense took place. The welcome messge effectively invited (authorised & unauthorised) people into the system. It would be interesting to know who's obligation it is to prove that the appropriate welcome message was in in place. There can be no doubt that accessing someone elses computer system is wrong but if you have no security and effectively invite someone in with a welcome message you only have yourself to blame. Even firewalls back in 1997 got the welcome message wrong, effectively inviting anyone to attempt to login.
Posted by: Neil 16 Jun 2008