09 Jun 2009
The introduction of generic top-level domains (TLDs) could wreak havoc across the internet if they are not implemented carefully and with suitable regulations in place to help minimise the risk of abuse, according to a new report.
TLDs, such as .com and .co.uk, are limited and tightly controlled, but new plans by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) mean that from early next year, anyone with sufficient cash and infrastructure can create their own generic TLD. This could be anything from a geographic reference such as .london, to a general concept such as .hotel, or even something completely random.
The report by research firm The Future Laboratory, on behalf of European domain registrar Gandi.net, said that most internet users do not believe that the liberalisation will have any discernable benefit to their online experience, and the majority believe it will lead to pointless domains, making the internet more complex, messy and confusing.
Further questions remain over who should govern these new generic TLDs. User and enterprise opinion is split between Icann, governments, registrars and public bodies.
The report highlighted issues around intellectual property and brand names being used by others, and also raised the issue of contentious domains such as .god, .war or .sex.
"Consumers and businesses alike are confused and worried," said Tom Savigar, strategy and insight director at The Future Laboratory.
"There is no clear sense of who is in charge at the moment, and who should be in charge going forward. As a result, the liberalisation of domain names, which is meant to encourage greater choice and diversity, is seen instead as being a daunting change to the internet."
Religious leaders have expressed dismay at the prospect of religion-themed TLDs. Vatican representative Monsignor Carlo Maria Polvani said in an open letter to Icann that the domains would provoke "bitter disputes", and force Icann into "giving a particular group or specific organisation the legitimacy to represent a given religious tradition".
Viviane Reding, the EU Commissioner for Information, Society and Media, urged Icann last month to sever its US government links, and assert itself as an independent judicial body. She called for Icann to become an impartial "G12 for internet governance".
"It is not defendable that the government department of only one country has oversight of an internet function which is used by hundreds of millions of people in countries all over the world," she said.
Other organisations such as the World Intellectual Property Organisation and online brand protection firm MarkMonitor have expressed concerns over the move, warning that it could open the floodgates for increased online criminal behaviour, as well as cause widespread confusion for users.
"The industry needs to grow up and take responsibility for itself," said Joe White, chief operating officer of Gandi.net.
"In the past it's been a bit like the Wild West, but the line between our online and offline worlds is blurring, and there needs to be greater transparency. The current plans for liberalisation reflect a great opportunity to get the domain space in order."
White believes that the move could actually initiate a clear-up of the internet, but that it is imperative for Icann to set clear guidelines and a high standard of practice when it comes to implementing the new generic TLDs.
Latest stories from Public Sector
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Principal Development Engineer Lead- London - Smart TV...
Development Engineer - London - Smart TV, Gaming, Tablets...
Principal Development Engineer - London - Smart TV, Gaming...
Test Engineer -London - Smart TV, Gaming, Tablets, PC...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
TLDs can be automatically selected based on DLD voting
Many things have changed since ICANN was created. ICANN was created to BUY TIME, while developers changed some of the technology. Soon, new technology will be released. ICANN does not need to be involved. 1. Modern DNS software does not use any root servers. 2. TLDs can be automatically selected based on DLD voting. http://www.icann.org/en/comments-mail/icann-current/msg00342.html 3. The next generation Internet architecture places an intelligent 'Node' at each home/office. The network simply connects the Nodes without getting in the way. ICANN will likely delay for a few more years while the DHT technology is prepared and tested.
Posted by: Jim Fleming 12 Jun 2009
Rubbish. Follow the money
Any time somebody says the introduction of new top level domains, and this has been going on for a decade, is going to cause problems, what they're saying is "it'll cause problems with me not getting that money" or "It'll cause problems for me not getting as much money. Initially ('86) there were com/net/org/mil/edu/gov and arpa. Between then and now 250+ new tlds popped up: one per country. This was done complely without oversight or regulation of any sort. It just happened. Sure there were some growing pains in some cases but you cannot find any disaster stories. And this is with hundreds of new TLDS! Without oversight of any sort. Let's ignore the question of what that's worth for a moment or how the US gave away 250+ exclusive internet franchises to sell top level domains to foreign nationals while denying American business the chance to compete. Over the next year if there are more than a dozen new TLDS added I'll eat my hat. And they might be a problem, but the hundreds that popped up before wern't? You're kidding, right? Syria has a TLD, Iran has a TLD, Yemen has a TLD, North Korea has a TLD, Mozambique has a TLD, Iraq has a TLD. Problems? Zero. US oversight? None. Oh and what did that all pay for their TLDS? Zero. Zip. Da Nada. Most started as one guy and a PC. So businesses vetted by the US government to run a tld that have to fork over a million bucks just to get in the game and subject to US oversight spells trouble, but any yahoo who called the right guy at the right time and got a country code TLD somehow ended up producing not one problem. So, pardon me if I don't take the opinion expressed in this article as anything near the truth. To me it simply smacks of blatent self interest and FUD. As usual This sort of anti-new tld nonsense has been going on for a decade - you can check for yourself - and the excuses are running out.
Posted by: Richard Sexton 09 Jun 2009