23 Oct 2010
Science is the lifeblood that flows through the modern technology industry, and we celebrate it with this week's list.
But for science, we'd be ignoring some of the fundamental truths of our society. Those truths may not be pretty, but they are part of our past and possibly our future. But, in order for this discipline to have an effect, it needs people to carry the word forward.
Now more than ever the world needs people to spread the word about science and the philosophy it espouses. We all call to the gods in our way when we stub our toes but, when you really need it, science is the choice most people take. The benefits have certainly been huge.
A note about some of the people who didn't make it onto the list. My choice, David Attenborough, missed his slot because he has chosen to focus his intellect on life and the planet, rather than technology. I fought hard but couldn't justify it.
Shaun showed his class by arguing for Tom Lehrer, and I admit I was sorely tempted. The Elements alone is a major merit point, and we both love Wernher von Braun, albeit for different reasons.
So here it is. As ever, let us know if there's something we've missed.
Honourable
Mention: Terry Pratchett
Iain Thomson:
Terry
Pratchett ('Sir' when he feels like it) is best known as a fiction writer,
especially the Discworld series which are still one of the most entertaining
reads in the biosphere.
However, Pratchett also collaborated (and generated a lot of the popularity, let's not deny it) on a series of popular science books entitled The Science of Discworld with co-authors Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen, who are proper scientists rather than just amazingly good at writing about it.
For those readers with an interest in science, and possibly kids who like a good read, these books are a goldmine. They cover physics, biology, chemistry and a fair amount of evolution, but clothe it in a Discworld framework that makes for easy reading and a narrative point too.
This is not to say that Pratchett doesn't add science into his stories but, since so much of his work is written in a world carried through the universe on the back of a giant turtle, this tends to be via allegory and metaphor.
Shaun Nichols: When putting this list together, Iain and I decided that we would make a point of leaving science fiction authors off the list for the most part. The only exceptions are Pratchett and another author who has devoted time to writing educational books along with science fiction titles.
Despite the nature of the genre, many science fiction titles can be fairly light on actual science, in many cases borrowing more from sociology, mythology and other areas to build the narrative than from any vision of the future.
Great science fiction writers are skilled at weaving together a story and savvy about cutting edge science and looming innovations. Few can do both, but the ones who can will become great.
Honourable
Mention: Dr Benoît Mandelbrot
Shaun Nichols: While few people are familiar with the work of
mathematician Benoît Mandelbrot, many are familiar with what his work has
yielded.
Some of the most commonly seen examples of computer generated graphics can be directly traced to Mandelbrot's work with fractals.
Formulated as a mathematical method for handling nonlinear information, fractals were later used by computers to generate particularly striking and beautiful images as well as financial plans and realistic simulations.
Those trippy screensavers on your old PC? They can be traced back to the work of Mendelbrot. Sadly, the accomplished mathematician and IBM Fellow died earlier this month after a battle with cancer.
Iain Thomson: The news that Benoît Mandelbrot had passed on was a sad tinge on an otherwise great weekend.
For those of us who grew up knowing nothing but a green screen or fuzzy TV picture (quiet you punch card users and long hand programmers in the back) it's possible that the first really memorable graphics you saw was a Mandelbrot set running on a primitive graphics card.
The pictures were pretty, but the concept of an infinite model was astounding, and many of us spent hours exploring the graphics and mindset of such a thing.
His work inspired many in the computing sphere to build a bit more fuzziness into mathematical models, and we've all seen the benefits. As a side point, a 1990s raver will recognise the graphics that still crop up today.
Latest stories from Components
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
TFL director of Games transport Mark Evers discusses how the public transport network is preparing for this summer's event
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
Head of Presales - Sip/Telephony My client is fast...
Service Desk Analyst / Desktop Support Circa £19k...
Infrastructure Project Manager Infrastructure Project...
Oracle Technical Architect - Senior, eBusiness, Fusion...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Narrow perspective
Can't see how you can include Dawkins ahead of Darwin, T H Huxley or even Stephen Jay Gould. And David Attenborough and Feynman are obvious omissions too. If you're going to include science fiction writers, what about Verne, Wells or Douglas Adams? Then there's Jane Goodall, Dorothy Hodgkin, Heinz Wolff...
Posted by: C Angolin 06 Nov 2010
Hullo America!
Hate to disabuse you guys, but this is a very americanised view of the world: Al Gore didn't bring awareness of climate change to the world, only the US of A where there are still people who believe the world is flat and are flabbergasted by Darwin: apropos of which, where is he on the list? The first person to challenge biblical creation theory in print? And how about Alan Turing, the father of the modern computer? Wake up US of A, there is a huge world out there beyond the boundaries of your state!
Posted by: Steve Atkinson 28 Oct 2010
There's one missing
I'm pretty sure that if you asked Stephen Hawking who the top science educator was he would say Richard Feynman. Now Feynman is mostly remembered by non-scientists for his work on the Challenger enquiry. But he built his reputation years earlier as a remarkably effective science educator.
Posted by: Bernard Peek 25 Oct 2010
Science versus technology
While I agree based on the content of this article that David Attenborough might not have been the best choice; given the title of the article, which I consider misleading, I can see why he should have been on the list. Please do not forget that science is far more than technology and in the scientific realm, David Attenborough is on par with many on this list and in my opinion above others.
Posted by: Bill R 25 Oct 2010