11 Aug 2005
Red Hat has called on Microsoft to promise publicly and in writing not to use software patents against users and individual developers of open source software.
"Let's leave customers out of this debate," Red Hat's deputy general counsel Mark Webbink told delegates at the LinuxWorld tradeshow in San Francisco.
"If Microsoft has intellectual property that needs to be respected, come to Red Hat, come to Novell, but leave our customers out of it. There is no cost to Microsoft for doing this and it would prove their sincerity."
Webbink asked for a similar promise towards developers, pointing out that there is little sense in going after individual developers because they cannot afford to pay large legal settlements or licence fees anyway.
Microsoft has said in the past that it does not have a problem with open source as a technology, but Webbink argued that a public statement would give that claim credibility.
Software patents are a major problem not just for open source but for software in general, according to Webbink.
While patents serve a purpose in other industries such as pharmaceuticals, they are only used to "tax competition" in software, preventing competitors from entering the market.
A single medicine, for example, is covered by a single patent, while software functions are often covered by multiple patents. Microsoft, for instance, owns 16 patents that cover the movement of the cursor.
"Innovation and patents are not the same thing," said Webbink. "Patents are
problematic for our industry; they are there to constrain and slow down
innovation."
Red Hat announced in June that it had started the creation of a patent commons
that would allow patent holders to allow open source projects to use the patent.
Earlier this week at LinuxWorld OSDL launched an initiative aimed at building a library of software patents that have been pledged towards open source.
Latest stories from Open Source
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A global consultancy is looking for a technical IT infrastructure...
External Technical Engineer, Rochdale This Lancashire...
Contract: L3 Solaris Administrator - Stockholm, Sweden...
C# or VB.NET Senior Developer / Team Leader x 2- Manchester...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
give us real software, real innovation
We already have copyright. The systems that currently grant software patent are flawed as acknowledged by most of the worlds leading software developers. Unless the standards of patents can be raised considerably (many are doubtful of that possibility) we will see increasing amounts of litigation by shell (patent holding) companies that will do nothing to enhance innovation in software. Sadly many other nations seem ready to follow the U.S. in this painful and unnecessary process that may not have an end, except may be for innovation in software. A single function consisting of a few lines of code could potentially be covered by unlimited numbers of patents or patents pending. It's impossible to know. No lawyer, or legal group, can guarantee protection against such un-knowable threats. No one can safely write software under those absurd conditions. That is bad news for the software industry and for all those that depend on it. Please grant us sane software patent regime or get rid of it entirely.
Posted by: Paul Sanderson 05 Mar 2006
work, motivation
If we don't give others the right to control the products of their own labor, then what motivation do they have to work?
Posted by: Dean Gores 14 Aug 2005