22 Nov 2006
Novell and Microsoft have exchanged punches over Microsoft's claim that Linux infringes its intellectual property.
In an open letter to the open source community published on 20 November, Novell chief executive Ron Hovsepian denied an IP-ownership claim by Microsoft.
"Our agreement with Microsoft is in no way an acknowledgment that Linux infringes upon any Microsoft intellectual property," Hovsepian wrote.
"When we entered the patent cooperation agreement with Microsoft, Novell did not agree or admit that Linux or any other Novell offering violates Microsoft patents."
The disagreement revolves around the Microsoft Novell partnership signed earlier this month.
In addition to distribution and interoperability agreements for the companies' software products, the two also created a patent covenant in which Microsoft promises not to enforce its intellectual property against users of Novell Linux, as well as individual software developers.
Novell's open letter prompted Microsoft to send out a press release on Monday stating that the two companies "have agreed to disagree" on the intellectual property issue.
"The agreement between our two companies puts in place a workable solution for customers for these issues, without requiring an agreement between our two companies on infringement," Microsoft said.
Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer ignited the row last Thursday when he said that the partnership was in part inspired by "the fact that [Linux] uses our patented intellectual property [which] is a problem for our shareholders".
Some observers initially considered the partnership as a major step towards a patent truce between Microsoft and Linux.
Microsoft enforcing its intellectual property portfolio against Linux users, developers or distributors is generally considered the greatest potential threat against the operating system.
Ballmer's comments reignited those fears, and underscored the notion that the software behemoth is looking to use its patent portfolio to levy an innovation tax on open source.
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Hands on with the highly anticipated Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich hybrid tablet
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A leading US Prop Trading House/Market Maker is currently...
A leading financial services group has an urgent requirement...
UI Developer Wanted - CSS, HTML, JavaScript with .NET...
Java Developer - Gloucestershire - £35-40k per annum...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
An Important Question
We've all read Hovsepian's letter, but are wondering whether it is sincere or spin. The Open Source community should insist on knowing the rationale for the $40 million Novell is paying Microsoft, and not just bury it in the return flow by netting it out. The answer to this question tells whether Novell is paying for Microsoft intellectual property which it claims does not exist in Linux.
Posted by: Leo from Walnut Creek 22 Nov 2006