09 Jul 2007
Microsoft has unilaterally changed the conditions for the Novell SuSE certificates that it sells to customers.
The move is intended to prevent Microsoft being subjected to the GPLv3 open source licence published on 29 June.
If Microsoft is bound by the GPLv3, it would be forced to provide a royalty-free patent licence to all users, developers and distributors of GPLv3 software.
The phenomenon is referred to as GPLv3 contamination, which Microsoft is trying desperately to prevent.
"Microsoft has decided that the Novell support certificates that we distribute to customers will not entitle the recipient to receive support from Novell, or any other party, nor any subscription for support and updates relating to any code licensed under GPLv3," the company said in a statement on 5 July.
To customers, the move means that the certificate will not offer them support for GPLv3 software.
The move surprised Mark Radcliffe, a partner and software licensing expert at Silicon Valley law firm DLA Piper.
"What is interesting is that Microsoft is reacting to the GPLv3 so quickly," he told vnunet.com.
"They never expressed their concerns. They never said: 'Look, we're going to pull the trigger and pull any GPLv3 code if you put this provision in.' I guess they decided that they didn't like the risk level that they going to take."
Although the Linux kernel itself is unlikely to switch to GPLv3, several components bundled with the kernel to form what is described as Linux have alre ady adopted the new licence.
Over time it is expected that Linux distributions will combine GPLv2 and GPLv3 components.
The certificates in question are part of the partnership that Microsoft and Novell signed in November.
As part of the agreement, Microsoft paid $240m for 70,000 coupons that entitle the owner to a free multi-year subscription to Novell's SuSE Linux Enterprise Server software.
Technically the certificates entitle the holder to support from Novell. Microsoft merely provides the coupons to the user.
Latest stories from Open Source
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A senior C# developer is required by a leading investment...
A senior JAVA developer is required by a leading financial...
A leading investment bank are looking for an AGILE JAVA...
A senior C# WPF F# developer is required by a leading...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Microsoft GPLv3
They don't like the agreement, so they issue a Bush-like "signing statement". And do what they want anyway. Nice people.
Posted by: Dave in Brooklyn 07 Jul 2007
Microsoft plays dirty, surprise, surprise!
It should come as no surprise that Microsoft plays dirty. They sign a contract and then claim they're not bound by it. If Novell or Rad Hat had done this the Microsoft fanboys would be having aneurysms over this. Mike http://quicktrivia.com
Posted by: Mike 07 Jul 2007