This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. > Find out more here
All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis
|
|
by Lee Collins
22 Feb 2013
Popular chat and messaging client
Review Rating:
Type: Free for personal use only
Platform: iPad, iPhone
Manufacturer: ICQ Inc
Price: Free
Unlike other instant messaging programs, ICQ identifies users by a unique number, which today seems a little old fashioned.
The ICQ client hasn't been that sophisticated in the past, but with version 5 it looks as if things are set to change. It comes with what ICQ has dubbed 'Xtraz', which includes such features as sending greetings cards, multi-chats, group messages and much more.
Also included is 'push-to-talk' technology, which you may have seen on the latest mobile phones. Basically, it's walkie-talkie-style communication whereby you can initiate a two-way voice conversation. This is available only if both users have version 5 or higher of ICQ.
ICQ Video has also been improved, with the video and chat window now integrated as one and the ability to take snapshots from a video window at any time.
Note that this is the iOS version of ICQ.
Similar downloads
Latest downloads
Audio (58) | Backup (57) | Browsers (74) |
Apple QuickTime 7.7.4 | HandBrake 0.9.9 | Google Chrome for Mac 27 FINAL |
Business Software (418) | Desktop Tools (47) | File Management (161) |
Calendarscope 6.0.0 | RoboTask 5.6.4 | SyncBack SE 6.4.3.0 |
A solid Android smartphone let down by less than stellar software
Updating your subscription status 
Access your email and documents from anywhere and easily collaborate with others via this cloud-based suite
Access your email and documents from anywhere and easily collaborate with others via this cloud-based suite
Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences
It's no longer one or other with web security; you can now have a virtualisation and SaaS hybrid model
BYOD is important for employee satisfaction, but poses challenges in terms of security, productivity loss and costs
Do you agree