22 Aug 2005
The right to vote is a precious
one and should never be abused. While some countries have gone for electronic
voting I've huge doubts about it. Now a foolproof system is being devised.
Despite my misgivings about
electronic voting this initiative should be applauded. It's a much better
solution than allowing private enterprise to take it on.
Take the situation in the US at the
moment. The two companies who dominate electronic voting machines manufacture
in the US
are run by brothers, one of who has very strong links to the Republican party.
Far be it of me to suggest any impropriety –
in fact the chances of them successfully getting away with fraud are minimal –
but it hardly inspires confidence.
In this country we have a paper
ballot; simple, incorruptible and checkable. There are those who say that
voting is too much of a hassle and electronic voting would increase turnout but
this is nonsense. Our ancestors fought and died for the freedoms we enjoy today
and winging because you've got to walk a few hundred feet to the nearest
polling place dishonours their memory.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
EU data protection overhaul contains "bureaucratic tick box-proposals", says information commissioner Christopher Graham in exclusive interview with V3
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
Technical support Specialist (2/3 rd Line) CCNA...
Aufgabe: - Das Design, die Implementation und Durchführung...
Aufgaben: - Provide basic IT support for the end users...
VPN - WAN - LAN - ASA - FSWM - Cisco - Routers - Swicthes...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?