08 Nov 2005
In among the general rejoicing at Mozilla over these figures on browser share there'll be a few worried faces in the developer labs.
You could argue until the cows come home over the security benefits of open versus closed source. I happen to think that open source is more secure and quicker to patch than commercial companies.
But all major code is unsafe; it will have flaws by its very nature. You can't have millions of lines of code and no mistakes, at least not until the gods start coding.
But the more popular Firefox becomes the more hackers will target it. The hacker, no matter if they're motivated by kudos or cash, will usually go for the largest number of users, and that means a popular browser.
So well done to Firefox, but also a warning: the Mozilla boys are going to need to be on their toes for a long time to come.
Latest stories from Security
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
What is the most important IT priority for your company this year?
Preview of the forthcoming handheld projectors with DLP technology
Connect with V3.co.uk
This paper focuses on a series of best practices and techniques for development teams looking to improve their software development processes
Why good data management at all levels is essential in the modern business (video, 6mins)
A Global Investment Bank is seeking to hire a Front to...
Telecoms Business Analyst - (Mobile/Telecoms/BPM) - Tanzania...
Web Content Manager - London - £45k Content Manager...
Infrastructure Team Lead (Hosting) - Contract - Cambridgeshire...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?