All the latest UK technology news, reviews and analysis


The year in legal: Patents hamper technology innovation

27 Dec 2012
gavelandscales

This year will end up being remembered for its litigation just as much as its innovation.

Legal battles took a lion's share of technology news this year. From patent battles to privacy battles, the legality of 21st century innovation has continued to stifle the industry.

Apple and Samsung have been entrenched in global patent lawsuits for two years. The two firms have sued each other around the globe this year.

Samsung was first sued for patent infringement in 2011. Apple accused Samsung of infringing on iPhone design and technology patents in a US lawsuit. Samsung counter-sued Apple in South Korea as retaliation.

The suits snowballed into cases around the world. Apple and Samsung legally fought in countries from Australia to the Netherlands.

Apple's case in the UK ended up in a highly publicised Samsung victory and public apology. German cases ended with a regional ban on Samsung Galaxy tablets.

The high-profile US case saw Samsung pay Apple $1bn in damages. Samsung has appealed the ruling and its case is now being heard by US District Judge Lucy Koh. Apple also sued Samsung again on new charges this November.

All of this and no end looks to be in sight. Apple and Samsung have the money to allow this sort of litigation to continue for years to come. Both companies will continue to make new products and sue new products well into the future.

Over at Motorola Mobility, the firm started its US patent litigation with Apple a year before Samsung. In 2010, Motorola Mobility sued Apple for infringements found in Macs, iPhones, and iPods.

Apple quickly counter-sued Motorola in a US court in Wisconsin. The company claimed Motorola had stolen from some of its touchscreen and other display tools.

Motorola also presented suits against Apple in Germany. Apple product injunctions were ordered in Germany last February. The ruling led Apple to send a complaint to the European Commission.

Apple alleged that Motorola was using standard-essential patents to unfairly sue the competition out of market. The case is currently being reviewed.

A US Motorola v Apple case in the US was thrown out of court this November. Judge Barbara Cobb said Apple would not have listened to the court's guidance had a pro-Motorola verdict been reached.

The global legal battle between Motorola and Apple looks to get even more divisive as Google recently purchased Motorola Mobility.

  • Comment  
  • Tweet  
  • Google plus  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Stumble Upon  
James Dohnert
About

James is a freelance writer and editor. In addition to ClickZ, his work has appeared in publications like V3, The Commonwealth Club, CachedTech.com, and Shonen Jump magazine. He studied Journalism at Weber State University.

More on Government
What do you think?
blog comments powered by Disqus
Poll

BYOD vs CYOD vs BYOC poll

Which approach is your firm taking to managing employees' mobile devices?
20%
14%
5%
20%
30%
11%

Popular Threads

Powered by Disqus
Google Android logo

How to take a screenshot on Android

A step by step guide to how to screen-grab on a Google-powered smartphone

Updating your subscription status Loading
Newsletters

Get the latest news (daily or weekly) direct to your inbox with V3 newsletters.

newsletter sign-up button
hpv33

Data protection: the key challenges

Deduplication is a foundational technology for efficient backup and recovery

rdc2

iPad makes its mark in the enterprise

The iPad can become a supercharged unified communications endpoint, allowing users to enhance their productivity

Data Modeller

Data Modeller required for a client investing in the...

1st/2nd Line Support Analyst - Service Desk Analyst - CONTRACT

Service Desk Analyst - 1st Line Support - 2nd Line Support...

Software Development Engineer

Develop: Customise: Configure. Maximise your technical...

Senior / Lead ASP.NET Developer

Senior / Lead ASP.NET Developer Retox Digital is...
To send to more than one email address, simply separate each address with a comma.