23 Jan 2012
Analysts and industry commentators have cast doubt on whether Research In Motion's (RIM) leadership changes are enough to boost the firm's poor financials and reverse its declining reputation among businesses.
RIM's Jim Basillie and Mike Lazaridis resigned from their co-chief executive roles on Monday after investors put pressure on the company to shake things up.
The firm has seen its once strong market share eroded by Android and iPhone devices entering the business market. In December, RIM's third-quarter earnings for 2011 showed profits down 71 per cent on the previous year.
The resignations follow a bad 2011 for RIM, with its PlayBook tablet proving a flop and customers around the globe affected by a major network outage in October. The company also cut 2,000 jobs last year, the biggest lay-off in its history
IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo told V3 that the promotion of chief operating officer Thorsten Heins to chief executive is unlikely to be enough to secure success for the firm.
"Of course it is good that the chief executives resigned as there was pressure on them from the market to do something," said Jeronimo.
"The doubt is whether an internal hire can make a difference. Heins is familiar with the company and knows what's going on but he can't bring in any new blood that RIM so badly needs."
Jeronimo said RIM should have been bolder, like Nokia was in September 2010 when it hired the president of Microsoft's business software group, Stephen Elop, as chief executive.
"Nokia was also suffering from poor performance so the firm took a bold move and hired someone from a different company and different region. Elop is now definitely working for them," said Jeronimo.
"Elop has really shaken things up and changed the mind-set of Nokia. People complained about him moving Nokia to Windows but Nokia's Lumia device is one of the best smartphones out there and Nokia's financial results are showing Elop is right on track."
Jeronimo said he expects RIM to maintain its current strategy under Heins, with the focus very much on new devices based on the QNX operating system. But will this be enough to lure users away from Android and iOS?
Latest stories from Management
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
TFL director of Games transport Mark Evers discusses how the public transport network is preparing for this summer's event
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
THIS ROLE IS LOOKING AT IMMEDIATE STARTERS AND WITH MULTI...
Sales Consultant - Data Centre, Colocation, Hosting...
Senior Interaction Designer (User Experience, UCD, Interactive...
Information Architecture / IA / User Experience / UX...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
not coCEO, some of their VPs and VPs's expert generate strange culture and self destruct ploictial environment
Don't blame CEO, they want RIM win. RIM has strange culture and self distruct political environment. In RIM if a new hired person figure out major problem and introduce efficient approach, both manager and his buddy group member will proof their wrong approach works. just like someone point out driving a car is right way, pushing a car is wrong way, then both manager and his buddy group member will hate you, and proof that 3 person can also move the car by pushing it. cheating email will be sent to some vice president, saying like: see, the car moving, pushing a car is a natural part of the process, in order to deny new hired contribution of introducing skill of drive a car, they have to deny merit of driving a car. It is very strange company culture and strange company political environment, it promote stealing and cheating skill. RIM's management may be a typical instance in MBA course. This culture deny or steal hardworking team members' contribution/innovation, generate strange political environment, destroy RIM. So don't blame CEO, some of their VPs and VPs' expert generate terrible culture and self destruct political environment.
Posted by: minzhu 25 Jan 2012