09 Jul 2009
Google's announcement that it will be entering the operating system market has caused a big stir, but it is unlikely to cause anyone at Microsoft to lose sleep, and more than a few senior managers at Redmond will be pleased as punch at the news.
On the face of it, some have seen the announcement of Chrome OS as another attack on Microsoft. After all, Google Apps was a direct shot across Redmond's bows in that it gave away similar applications to Microsoft's Office suite, which is a huge cash cow for the company.
Surely Chrome OS is just an expansion of this corporate war? Well, not as such. First off let's look at what Chrome OS actually is. It's really just a new front end to a Linux kernel. There are plenty of Linux distributions out there at the moment, and none of them is really threatening Microsoft's hold on the operating system market.
Secondly, the new operating system is aimed at netbooks which, while a fast growing section of the computer market, isn't anywhere near as big a deal as PCs, servers and laptops.
Windows is holding onto its market share in the netbook segment, and there are already preinstalled versions of Linux available for the market. But people aren't going for them in big numbers, despite some being clearly superior to Windows Vista.
Netbooks are primarily consumer devices, and consumers have been raised with Microsoft systems for the past 15 years and are unlikely to risk anything new. Similarly, manufacturers are used to installing Windows and know they can sell systems with it.
This brings us on to the next point: preinstalling. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) have remained pretty quiet about Chrome OS, and it will have to be preinstalled to succeed. Skilled computer users might be able to install and debug an operating system, but few businesses or consumers will want to bother. They want something that works straight out of the box, or as near to that as possible.
Naysayers might point out that computer manufacturers are motivated by cost, and that Chrome OS will be free. But there are already plenty of free operating systems out there, and OEMs are far more concerned about what people will buy rather than saving a licensing fee that they can pass on to the purchaser anyway.
Red Hat, Ubuntu and Debian, among others, have been offering enterprise-ready operating systems for years at a fraction of the cost of Windows, yet OEMs have not dipped much more than a tentative toe in the water to try them.
Another element is the broadly favourable response to Windows 7, which is due out later this year. While Vista is an almost universally recognised dog of an operating system, Windows 7 actually looks rather good and businesses in particular are eager to try it out, since most of them have stuck with XP and could use Windows 7 to jump the entire Vista upgrade step.
Latest stories from Operating Systems
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
SQL Server Developer - Our client, an international...
IT Technical Service Delivery Manager / ITIL / Reigate...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
competative OS?
I can see where the previous responders are coming from, but I have a feeling that the world is just about ready for a change. If Google can release a product that not only works but that is also stable, reliable, works with many of the existing applications (or can convince the companies to write in their OS) , is secure and not constantly needing updating and most importantly of all a smaller footprint allowing it to boot in and work a lot faster, then it may be the very thing to swing the public away from Microsoft. I have dabbled with various Linux distros over the years but I have found that they do not just work out of the box and are therefore not ready for general public consumption, though they are close to it now. That is the real selling point of Microsoft - the ease of use. Google has the backing to round of the OS so that it just works, and that will appeal to a lot of people.
Posted by: BigT 14 Jul 2009
Netbooks
The OS is focused on netbooks. Generally with these your looking at simply web based items. You may do some spreadsheets and word docs but all that would be covered with google docs. as for the distros. Last one i checked was ubuntu which gave me out of the box drivers for a cards that i had to search relentlessly across the internet to find windows drivers for. While i agree that google doesnt stand a chance at taking over the OS market, i do think they will be able to hit MS netbook holdings because of the mass amount of money they will put into showing the common person how easy it will be for them to learn and use
Posted by: Shane 14 Jul 2009
Jeff
You're kidding about OEMs, right? Which vendor honestly thinks that people buy PC's to surf the web and read email? Hell, my *mother* wouldn't touch a new machine unless it can run QuickBooks. Its the Apps, stupid, and Google have pre-emptively shot themselves in the foot by announcing that "all the in-Chrome goodness can be experienced by anyone with a standards-compliant browser". There can't be a "killer-app" in that environment which is what it takes to move serious metal - all but the cheapest of the cheap vendors will be yawning at this particular move, they might pay lip service by adding a new offering to their lineup but Windows and OSX have nothing to fear, and in fact OSX has plenty to gain. If Google succeed in weaning people off Windows, OSX will be just as viable a platform for the Chrome-Apps due to its webkit browsers. And, of course, if Google turn out to have misled the public and you *cant* run your apps on any other os/browser, you can believe that they'll have killed any chance that people will risk putting their valuable data "into the cloud".
Posted by: Jeff 10 Jul 2009
Really?
Which linux distros are "clearly superior to xp" and how? Fit for purpose maybe? Less breakable, faster to start up and lower resources? Certainly. Still a fair bit of farting about with Linux distros though. If Chrome ultimately is just a sort of properly plug 'n play and supported (app store?!) environment then it could be superb for notebooks. Because the Linux distros aren't really this at all. I know lots of people that experimented with linux on netbooks and none who stuck with it. P.S. your captcha is really annoying.
Posted by: Mat Bettinson 09 Jul 2009
Declaiming about the future with too much certainty is never a smart move
Red Hat, Ubuntu and Debian are unknown to non-geeks, and that is an enormous difference from google. As computers continue to commoditise there is no guarantee that vendors will always be able to pass on the costs of Windows. I have no idea how this will pan out, but dismissing it now is as facile as going to the other extreme.
Posted by: Oliver Chettle 09 Jul 2009
You missed an important point!
If you look at the two most succesful OS's so far in the general consumer arena and business, WIndows and Mac, then one of the defining reasons for their success is Marketing. Generate interest in your product and OEM's will be beating a line to your door to get your OS pre-installed because consumers will be demanding it. It doesn't even have to be that good a product. Since Google has the cash flow to compete with Microsoft, Apple, Red Hat, Ubuntu in this arena we may be seeing the first case of Linux being effectively marketed to the mass market. If thats the case I would be very nervous over at Redmond and any other OS manufacturer. This may be a paradigm shift that sinks a number of companies.
Posted by: Andrew Hunter 09 Jul 2009
Old dogs and all that
Lots of people don't like change. I think many would worry about switching to another OS (even if it is a well known brand like Google). My dad and his generation have only just come to terms with windows (or "magic in a box" as he calls it) so I don't think he'd relish this change. Then there are privacy concerns. Every now and then a story concerning google and privacy appears in the press. There will be those who don't want to entrust so much personal information in some mega google cloud. Also, for myself, there are legacy issues which would make me err on the side of caution and stick with th devil i know. Then there's the EU and the US Justice Dept to consider. If a google OS were to be even moderately successful wouldnt this constitue a considerable search/OS monopoly?
Posted by: Tim 09 Jul 2009