05 Aug 2009
Roger Burkhardt is president and chief executive of open-source database firm Ingres. Prior to joining Ingres, Burkhardt was chief technology officer (CTO) and executive vice president at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for six years. He and his team were responsible for transforming the exchange to a fully electronic model, and conducted much of the IT work using open-source software.
V3.co.uk: You were a very early adopter of open-source
software when you were CTO at the NYSE in 2006. What encouraged you to implement
the programme?
Roger Burkhardt: Initially we had to innovate very rapidly as
we were facing a lot of competition from totally electronic venues. Part of my
role was to introduce electronic trading, and in doing that we needed a lot of
new technology capabilities. We found that the open-source model allowed us to
move more quickly. We could innovate more quickly and that meant we could fulfil
our business objectives more quickly.
But then something happened. As we introduced electronic trading the volume of data just exploded. In the trading world it used to be that, as human beings traded more quickly, they talked to each other more online and on the phone. But as we introduced an electronic trading software programme, the volume of messages sent through the exchange just exploded and we needed to cut costs, otherwise the computing capacity to handle messages would put us out of business. We found that by using open source and open standards we could substantially lower our costs.
Also, through using open-source software, we could introduce competition where there had not been enough before between providers and vendors. So, although we started to deploy open source because of necessity, we were also able to get more value out of it to drive costs down through competition.
How much were you able to drive down costs?
By around 50 per cent.
What research did you do before introducing open source?
Well, it was eight years ago that we first looked at open-source software to
drive the screens on the trading floor that people look at for pricing and news.
We looked at Linux and we could customise it to meet our needs. We could also
get good support from vendors. The good news is that, when you do research for
open source, you can easily try it out and get very good information about the
product from the community behind it. All the feedback from the users is out in
the community for all to see, so you never have to rely on a sales person who is
just going to tell you what you want to hear. You can actually interact with
other users in the community, and validate what is really there.
Why did you move from CTO at the NYSE to chief executive of
Ingres?
During the six years I spent at the NYSE I achieved all that I set out to do,
which was to introduce an all-electronic system, or what is known as a hybrid
market in the US. I was trying to work out whether I would do another chief
technology officer role, or whether to do something different. I was approached
about this role at Ingres, and what was exciting for me was the opportunity to
make a business model that is so much better for customers, and so much better
for the industry, and bring it into the enterprise database world.
Until Ingres came out as open source, there was not really an alternative choice to the Oracle database or the Sybase database. There was no enterprise-class, open-source choice. It was an exciting opportunity to go and build something, and I was pleased that the funders behind the company wanted to have the customer in charge. The nice thing about open source is that the customer is in charge and you are not locked into a particular vendor.
How do you deal with Oracle as your main competitor?
It is a David and Goliath situation. Customers have had it with the proprietary
model that puts a gun to their heads and requires them to buy licences when they
don't have to have them. Customers are demanding a better business model. I know
as an ex-customer and talking to new customers that what they really want is an
alternative to the lock-in model.
How is Ingres dealing with the recession?
We grew 30 per cent in the recession and last year we brought in $68m [£40m] in
revenue. When we were formed three years ago we made $26m [£15m].
So would you say Ingres has been hit at all?
No-one is immune to the crisis. This is the worst recession in 30 years. We seem
to have drawn quite a bit of interest from people who know that they have to do
more with less. Either they adopt better ways of procuring software, or they
save millions of dollars somewhere else. My budgets used to be dominated by
salary and costs and, if you can't save money on the software side, you have to
lay people off and no-one likes to do that. Cutting back on talent is cutting
back on the future innovation of the business.
The recession makes the choice stark. With budgets decreasing or investment flat, businesses need to compete and they need IT to compete with. This makes people look at open source who would not have done so before.
Latest stories from Management
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
TFL director of Games transport Mark Evers discusses how the public transport network is preparing for this summer's event
Connect with V3.co.uk
The wrong printers, for the wrong tasks on the wrong contracts
Who leads the BI pack and who should we be watching out for?
THIS ROLE IS LOOKING AT IMMEDIATE STARTERS AND WITH MULTI...
Sales Consultant - Data Centre, Colocation, Hosting...
Senior Interaction Designer (User Experience, UCD, Interactive...
Information Architecture / IA / User Experience / UX...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
Roger you're So right!
Sorry Wallyton, but you're so wrong! Who do the limited number of Postgres users turn to for support? How good is that support? I rest my case.
Posted by: Jimbo 12 Aug 2009
Open Source Databases
I enjoyed the first part of this article, the background on Burkhardt's work at NYSE, and how they solved real problems with Open Source. Great stuff. But Burkhardt lost me with "Until Ingres came out as open source, there was not really an alternative choice to the Oracle database or the Sybase database. There was no enterprise-class, open-source choice." It doesn't hurt you to mention the competition in this space, it helps. PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL, PostgreSQL. Say it. Postgres has been doing the Open Source database heavy lifting as an alternative to ORCL and others for 20+ years.
Posted by: Wallyton 05 Aug 2009