24 Jul 2009
Windows 7 has now been released to manufacturing, and the much-anticipated next version of Windows will be available for TechNet subscribers and enterprise Software Assurance customers to download within weeks. With this in mind, V3.co.uk has come up with a list of the top 10 reasons for upgrading to Windows 7.
Think we've missed one? Disagree with our choices? Then have your say at the bottom of the page.
1. 'Available networks' tool on taskbar
If you're a laptop user, it's almost worth installing Windows 7 for this feature
alone. Like all great ideas, it's disarmingly simple: put a control on the
taskbar, accessed via a single mouse click, that shows available Wi-Fi networks
and lets you choose which one to connect to. It's a world away from the hoops
Windows Vista makes you jump through to get a Wi-Fi connection.
2. Fewer annoying pop-ups
Vista users will be familiar with the constant barrage of pop-up messages the
system subjects them with: 'Windows Defender needs your attention', 'Check
Windows Firewall settings', 'Updates available for your computer', and so on. In
Windows 7, most of these messages appear instead in a notification area on the
taskbar, so you can deal with them at your leisure.
3. HomeGroup
HomeGroup should make it much easier to share files and other content such as
music and pictures among all computers connected to a home network. It lets each
user control what they want to share from their own computer, and any new
Windows 7 PC connecting to the network will automatically find the HomeGroup,
but needs a password to join.
4. Device Stage
Device Stage is a new user interface for working with peripherals like phones,
cameras or printers in Windows 7. It not only shows all the information about
your device, but brings together all the applications and services you can use
with it in one place.
5. BitLocker support for removable storage
The Bitlocker encryption tool was introduced in Vista, but only in some editions
and only for the boot drive of a PC. In Windows 7, BitLocker to Go lets you
encrypt and password-protect USB devices such as Flash memory sticks to secure
files in case you misplace the drive.
6. Speedier boot-up
With some PCs that we've seen running Vista, you could hit the on switch then go
away and make a cup of tea before being able to actually use the system for
anything. By contrast, Windows 7 boots up and is ready in about 30 seconds flat.
In fact, Windows 7 seems more responsive than Vista all round, even on the same
hardware.
7. Libraries
Libraries are like folders, except they conveniently bring together content from
multiple locations into one place. For example, the Pictures library lets you
see all photos and images to which you have access, whether they are spread
across several folders on your hard drive or even on a network share.
8. User Account Control is less in-your-face
The User Account Control (UAC) feature was introduced in Vista to improve
security but has proved extremely annoying, popping up and asking for
confirmation whenever you want to open Device Manager, add drivers, or dozens of
other tasks. In Windows 7, UAC has been reworked so that users can carry out a
greater range of tasks without a UAC prompt asking them for confirmation or
administrator credentials.
9. Multi-touch
On systems with a compatible touch screen, Windows 7 supports gesture-based
input and control, like you might see on Apple's iPhone, but it works with
pretty much all applications, not just those created for Windows 7. This means
you can tap on the screen to launch applications, use your finger to scroll up
and down in Internet Explorer and Word documents, and doodle using your
fingertip in Paint.
10. It's not Windows Vista
Enough said.
Latest stories from Operating Systems
Related articles
Related jobs
Poll
Are you confident that the UK's IT infrastructure is secure from attack in the wake of the Flame malware revelations?
V3 examines the key strengths and weaknesses of Samsung's latest iPhone killer
Connect with V3.co.uk
Social networking is almost ubiquitous. This white paper examines the benefits and risks and it looks at the different ways companies can reconcile them
The importance of understanding your infrastructure
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
About Us WorldPay provides a globally connected, locally...
SQL Server Developer - Our client, an international...
IT Technical Service Delivery Manager / ITIL / Reigate...
Keep up to date with the latest products, services and technologies from the world's leading IT companies. IThound.com brings you over 2,000 white papers, case studies and analyst reports.
Do you agree?
vista
Ive has several bsod crashes when using bluetooth devices paired to the laptop. vista sp2 has not fixed this issue. Worst Vista issue is file transfer speed... Other than that I wont be upgrading to Win 7...the version I want will cost more than I paid for my laptop.
Posted by: bogomips 27 Aug 2009
It's happening all over again...
Mac vs PC, Xbox360 vs PS3, Tekken vs Street fighter.. Do we not remember when Microsoft introduced Windows XP after he Windows 98' era?..A majority of people had debated that Win98' is much better than XP. Then in time Windows 98' starts to fade..and now now, very few people use Win98'...But now XP is the current OS era (or was) alongside Mac OS... In my opinion, maybe not Vista, but Win7 maybe just like XP when it was first released, there may be doubts, but i'm sure it'll catch on..
Posted by: jeffrey konig 31 Jul 2009
Windows 7
I have been running the 32bit release candidate since it was released on a 3ghz intel core 2 duo, with 4GB ram and an nvidia 8800gts oc. I have to say that it is fantastic compared to xp and vista. I use vista on my tablet and I used to have xp on the desktop above. After install everything just worked, when you plug in a device (like my walkman) it comes up a picture of the device, its current battery level, etc etc etc very nice touch, The new taskbar is very very efficient. All in all this is a much more pleasant place to be than any previous windows and I used to prefer mac osx to vista/xp but now I would exclusively use 7 and only use osx if I had to
Posted by: Matt 29 Jul 2009
XP to 7
As Makka says how does it look when moving from XP? I resisted the Vista move as it gave a lot things I didn't want or need at a high price of memory and convenience, let alone the multitude problems updating many programs that were non Vista compatible. Does 7 demand all these requirements plus a few more features that I am not sure I need?
Posted by: Jeff Owen 29 Jul 2009
I was expecting something signifcant here...
I use GNU/Linux for my day to day computing needs but have been interested in the current reception of Windows 7. On that same note I dual boot with Vista for gaming and certain proprietary solutions I use for my computing needs (I'm more in the 'right tool for the right job' school of thought). Vista is not a bad OS. I can understand people being upset when they put Vista-Ready stickers on machines with 512MB and on-board video without informing customers that they won't enjoy the new features to the best of their capability but I otherwise find it a nice upgrade to their current software set from XP. That all being said, Windows 7 seems like a giant service pack to me. When in a Top 10 list for a brand new OS that Microsoft is charging $219.00 for a license you have "less annoying pop-ups" (considering most come from UAC and people not understanding it) come up twice -- that's a scary thing. Honestly, the most I've heard is 'more stable than vista (okay, they're using all of vista driver compatibility and building off it ... so makes sense), the new taskbar is cool!, they updated paint!' (oh and bit locker on this list isn't even available unless you're using the high tier version). Due to all this I've seen no reason to try the betas that were being released (I did in a VM just to poke around, but I mean native install) when it offers nothing of substance. One thing is for sure, it's crazy the amount of glowing press it's getting for it's minimal changes.
Posted by: Brett D. 28 Jul 2009
Vista / Mac / Linux / Mac / Blah
I get everyones points - i think the word "moron" due to not being a Mac user is a little harsh - you can't really slate someone for their choice of OS, by all means, Mac OSX is amazing, I'm a massive fan, but I also put a hefty vote in favour of Windows 7. The nature of it is that perhaps some of these "morons" can't afford the 700/800 quid tag for a decent mac but are happy with their £300 advent PC, you can see the point there. Its all a matter of taste. As for the top 10, it is a bit poor, but hey - it can't be that badly written or even be bad journalism, because face it, we all read it and felt strongly enought o fire up a bit of healthy debate. Daniel did what a journalist is supposed to - pass on the info and let the crowd rant it out afterward. Enjoy your mac, enjoy the lovely ubuntu and enjoy 7 if thats your bag. Fan boys can be fan boys, just no need to be harsh about an OS - theres a whole world out there as well you know! XBOX is better than PS3.... FIGHT!
Posted by: esoteric mr k 28 Jul 2009
been running vista
for 3 months without a single cra
Posted by: trev 24 Jul 2009
As Vista should have been
Windows 7 as I see it is just an improved version of Vista making it the system Vista should have been. After all it is the same basic platform as Vista with a few improvements to enable the system to require less power and run more efficiently.
Posted by: Hellfire 24 Jul 2009
ubuntu is free and more features
Nothing more needs to be said.
Posted by: XKO Web Hosting 24 Jul 2009
Oh yeah and..
it is not Linux either!
Posted by: PenGUIn 24 Jul 2009
Network and Vista
Vista really isn't that bad and UAC can be turned if in 4 clicks. As for the network, You click once on the network icon by the time, then click connect or disconnect, then click the wireless network. it couldnt be easier!
Posted by: kan 24 Jul 2009
Available networks
This option in availabe since XP days, there is nothing new there.
Posted by: A. Vijay 24 Jul 2009
so...
...basically it's more like a mac?
Posted by: robert 24 Jul 2009
Interesting
Mac has had all these features for years - and it is faster, stable and available now - why would anyone choose Windows 7 over Mac OS X? Really - I installed the Windows 7 beta and thought that it was better than Vista, but not by much. Given the choice - - why settle for a second rate system. Steve Balmer and his buddies just can't get it right. I know deep down they know they will never beat Mac OS X - Do the right think and stop buying junk from Microsoft. It is just embarassing at this point.
Posted by: Tukoti 24 Jul 2009
Win7 Daniel Robinson Got It All Wrong
Don't agree with Daniel Robinson's point 10 - "It's not Vista". This kind of reasoning belongs in the tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes" In what can only be described as a brilliant move by Microsoft, Vista has been given a very modest upgrade and rebranded successfully, duping the Vista haters into embracing an OS they should never have really reviled in the first place. It amuses me no end to hear all the Windows 7 lovers explaining how great it is, yet how bad Vista was. If you'd actually spent any time with Vista you'd notice: Vista and Win7 are not very different at all. Windows 7? No, Vista 2009 more like :)
Posted by: Rick K 24 Jul 2009
Wrong, it is Windows Vista
That last line, "it's not Windows Vista," is actually mostly wrong: most of the underlying code is still Vista code. Check it out if you don't believe me. We've seen this sort of early-adopter over-enthusiasm many times before....remember the Vista rollout? Don't jump at all the early reports telling you how great Win 7 is....deep bugs don't usually reveal themselves to glib enthusiasts. All operating systems are complex monstrosities and all are laden with thousands of bugs--these bugs only tend to show up when you probe into the deep feature set. That's where the funny bugs will show up....you have to test beyond a few simple basics.
Posted by: PC Programmer 24 Jul 2009
Redundant features
You see that the product is not that good when the "top 10" feature list have to say "it is less annoying" with different words: 2. Fewer annoying pop-ups 8. User Account Control is less in-your-face 10. It's not Windows Vista Thank you, but I'll stay with my free Ubuntu. It is faster, less annoying, and more reliable.
Posted by: foo 24 Jul 2009
XP to Win7
Tonnes of articles about how windows 7 is better than Vista... But... XP was better than Vista, so how about comparing 7 to XP for the smart people that didn't go anywhere near Vista in the first place?
Posted by: Makka 24 Jul 2009
And other goodies too
Win7 is much more secure than XP, including geeky upgrades that get no press coverage (Google on "/gs++ compiler buffer overrun" or "windows integrity control") but which are very important. Win7 drivers will be available much quicker than for Vista because the vendors merely have to tweak their Vista drivers, not write new ones from scratch. The netbook market will help to push Win7 prices lower, and Win7 is already being released at a lower price than Vista's release price. And you probably won't have to buy new hardware to run Win7 if you've got 2GB of memory, it's faster than Vista. The increased thread count in Win7 over XP is deliberate, it's a good thing for performance. If a complex task is divided across multiple threads and you have multiple physical or logical processors, the task can be divided across the processors. Most XP processes, on the other hand, are single-threaded and thus benefit less from have multi-core CPUs. This is especially true for multi-threaded x64 apps. This is why performance tests designed to make Win7 look bad often run single-threaded apps. The built-in firewall is good enough that you don't need to buy a commerical one, and soon Microsoft Security Essentials will be released, which is a free anti-virus scanner. Security Essentials has been getting very good reviews by the AV test orgs. AppLocker is a feature which allows you to create allow/block lists for programs, similar to Bit9 Parity, and it's manageable through PowerShell or Group Policy. Win7 will have PowerShell 2.0 built in by default, which upgrades the ancient CMD command shell is doubleplus cool for geeks. The Win7 Troubleshooting Center runs PowerShell scripts in the background behind the GUI to fix networking problems for you (look in the %Windir%\Diagnostics folder). In corp environments, TONS more things can be managed through Group Policy on Win7 than on XP. Virtually every aspect of the machine is centrally manageable, e.g., wireless settings and AppLocker. And I'm sure more can be added to the list, this is just from the top of my head.
Posted by: Tired of the Anti-MS Bias in the IT Press 24 Jul 2009
win7 vs the others
I have to tell you, that as an IT guy for the past 9 years, having installed and used everything from 95-Vista, Server 08, this win7 ultimate installation was the easiest and fastest yet. I started at 605pm est last night, finished at 645pm est..My machine is an older dell inspiron b130 pentium m 1.8 ghz with 2gb ram, 80gb ide drive...not a robust box at all, but win 7 performs much faster than vista ever did, and better that xp pro sp3...it picked up all but two drivers, when i connected up to the net, found em and installed em, no worries...I renamed it, and it automatically joined my home network, found all my pc's and shared drives, etc....So far, no software issues either, ms office 07, avast, etc..all work well...Everything is faster, shutdowns quickly and boots really fast...All in all, i like it so far and am impressed..I think they got it right on this one.....
Posted by: Peritus IT Solutions, Charlotte NC USA 24 Jul 2009
none
I have been testing windows 7 for a while now and it is sad that a company as big as Microsoft with so many resources have developed an OS with the top 10 features like you described (which I would agree with you, I would also add the dock as one of the best features). I have one word MACINTOSH...for all you morons who haven't switched, switch now and enjoy a hassle free computer life. These top 10 features are just catch ups to Apples already far sophisticated OS.
Posted by: jimmy joe joe 24 Jul 2009
Still worse than XP
In other words Win7 fixes things that shouldn't have been in Vista, but still does nothing better than XP.
Posted by: FormerMSFan 24 Jul 2009
Yawn
What a yawner. 2 and 8 look to be the same. As for # 1, I alaready have that in my taskbar ... in Windows XP! The rest of the stuff fluff muff ... not too impressed so far.
Posted by: Roger McCook 24 Jul 2009
My top 10
1) It's not Vista, 2) It's not Vista, 3) It's not Vista, 4) It's not Vista, 5) It's not Vista, 6) It's not Vista, 7) It's not Vista, 8) It's not Vista, 9) It's not Vista, 10) It's not Vista. Top two problems with Windows 7 1) It's Vista 2.0 2) It's not OS X http://teknoboy.blogspot.com/
Posted by: teknoboy 24 Jul 2009
Comment 10
Come on. Nothing like jumping on the anti Vista bandwagon. This just shows the density of your reporting skills.
Posted by: Arty 24 Jul 2009