.
/v3-uk/news/2006263/patent-suit-targets-red-hat-novell
15 Oct 2007, Tom Sanders in California , V3
Intellectual property licensing firms IP Innovation and Technology Licensing Corporation have filed a lawsuit against Red Hat and Novell for alleged patent infringements in their Linux distributions.
The legal case is the first patent challenge against Linux distributors in court, and concerns patent numbers 5,072,412, 5,533,183 and 5,394,521.
All three describe a "user interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects" and were issued between December 1991 and February 1995.
The suit was filed on 9 October in the district court of Eastern Texas, where judges are known to favour patent owners.
The plaintiffs demand an injunction prohibiting Novell and Red Hat from continuing to infringe the three patents, as well as unspecified damages.
Novell and Red Hat have indemnification clauses in their user agreements, vowing to protect end users from such claims. Users can therefore trust that they will not be affected by the suit.
A Novell spokesperson said that the firm is evaluating its options and vowed to defend its interests. Red Hat did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Intellectual property licensing firms like IP Innovation and Technology Licensing Corporation exist for the sole purpose of licensing patents.
Because they do not make any products of their own, they cannot be targeted with countersuits which have traditionally been the defence of choice against patent suits.
Firms targeted by these so-called 'patent trolls' are often forced to settle. Microsoft paid $521m in August 2007 to end a patent suit from Eolas, while Research in Motion paid $612m in March 2006 to end a patent suit from NTP.
The US Supreme Court limited the power of patent trolls earlier this year. A panel of judges ruled that an automatic injunction was only required if the plaintiff produced a product that relied on the patent.
Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer predicted last week that Linux vendors would soon be targeted by patent holding companies.
Ballmer also warned that Red Hat users would have to compensate Microsoft for patents which the firm believes are infringed by Linux.
The Linux Foundation denounced the latest threat. Jim Zemlin, the organisation's executive director, said in an emailed statement that the patent claims against Red Hat and Novell would be defeated in a similar way to IBM and Novell's defeat of S CO.
"This case will aid those of us who advocate the cause of patent reform by demonstrating the wasteful drain that the current process imposes on innovative activities," said Zemlin.
"We are committed to continuing our vigorous support for meaningful amendment of the software patent laws."
Do you agree?
Two points:
1. First of all, the patent is ASSIGNED to the Xerox Corporation. That means that only Xerox owns the legal capability to sue any one. Others do not. Proof would be required where the suers have acquired from XEROX any rights on this patent. Even if the inventor have rights to royalties from Xerox, they don't have any right to represent the patent. And, if they did not even have any royalties agreements from Xerox, no one has case whatsoever for any claims from any one. Only XEROX owns that right, unless there's proof otherwise.
The first thing that the suers need to be requested to provide is a documet from Xerox proving that they can make any claim. Even the individuals who are listed as inventors, in this case, have no right to sue any one, unless Xerox has granted legal rights to any one.
2. The patent has only a few months of life left.
The suers ought to be punished if they are found to have no legal basis to sue anyone, and are mis-representing if not, and can be sued-back for a number of reasons, begining with usurpation.
Posted by mbls, 14 Oct 2007