.
/v3-uk/news/2006135/verizon-ditched-iphone-apple-control-freakery
30 Jan 2007, Iain Thomson , V3
Details have emerged of the pre-launch manoeuvring over the iPhone between Apple and US network provider Verizon.
According to reports in USA Today, Verizon was in negotiations two years ago to carry the phone but felt unable to proceed because of demands made by Apple concerning how it was to be marketed.
"We said no. We just could not reach a deal that was mutually beneficial," said Jim Gerace, a Verizon Wireless vice president.
"Apple would have been stepping in between us and our customers to the point where we would have almost had to take a back seat on hardware and service support."
Gerace revealed that Apple wanted a slice of all call charges for using the phone, and refused to let Verizon subsidiaries stock the phone. It also wanted control over any repairs carried out on the hardware.
Under the terms of the proposed deal only Verizon would have been able to sell the phone, leaving Wal-Mart, Best Buy and other Verizon distributors out in the cold.
Apple would also have handled all repairs and replacements of faulty or broken hardware, which Verizon felt was unacceptable.
In the end Cingular got exclusive rights to the phone. No details on the contract have been released, but Cingular is thought to have negotiated a five-year exclusive contract.
Do you agree?
Apple is looking out for the consumer.
Yes, Apple, like any business, wants to turn a profit (and the bigger the better). However, Apple wants to retain control of the iPhone to ensure that the customers get what they deserve. Verizon is very notorious for severely crippling their phones. Cingular has a better track record on this. Apple does not want a cell service provider to limit the device any more than Apple has decided to limit the device. This is much like when Jobs refused to change the price structure at iTunes. The record companies want more money. Apple wants to provide a consistant and simple interface to the user.
I feel that this is a good thing.
Posted by john noonan, 31 Jan 2007