Households face £570 bill for digital TV
/v3-uk/news/2005593/households-gbp570-digital-tv
19 Sep 2005, Ken Young , V3
Households will have to pay between £80 and £570 to receive digital television if they wait until the switchover in 2012, according to estimates from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell said last week that equipment and installation would be provided free for the elderly and the disabled, but concern is growing that households already receiving digital TV may face additional costs owing to the need to convert other sets and video equipment.
The department estimates that such conversion will cost £80 to £190 per device, based on set-top boxes costing £40-£80 and indoor aerials at £30. It also indicated that 10 per cent of houses will need to convert an outside aerial at a whacking cost of around £570.
Households that upgrade the first TV set to Sky's Freesat service would pay from £230-£340, the department said.
Figures from Ofcom suggest that 63 per cent of the country already has digital TV access.
Colin Tinto, chief technology officer at Home Media Networks, which develops media center software, said: "We found that very few people need to upgrade their aerials, meaning that the set-top box is the user's only cost.
"For homes with more than one TV a set-top box is not the only solution. Some TV tuner cards for PCs can be purchased more cheaply than a set-top box.
"By using additional third-party software the consumer can view TV schedules and record hundreds of hours of TV, all for less than £100.
"One of the main reasons that the government wants to switch everyone to digital is to free up the radio spectrum which will allow it license this space, as it did with 3G, making billions for the Treasury.
"With this additional cash, we suggest that the government should provide all homes with set-top boxes to ease the cost of households turning to digital programming."
Do you agree?
Rip-Off again!
Once more the consumer is having to pay for something not necessarily required. My wife and I watch very little TV - mostly news and some sport - we live three miles from the centre of Birmingham and we can't even get a watchable picture on Channel 5 - so why should we HAVE to pay for digital TV we won't even watch?
Posted by Chris C, 26 Sep 2005
Terrestrial Lottery
Depending where one resides say in some cosy valley in north Wales or the Lake Distict (can't speak for Scotland) but assume the same applies the digital signal is so weak that only a satalite option is viable. Within the next 3 years the analogue signal will be switched off in these areas. In Wales the repeater masts have not been digital enhanced yet. No wonder the government can't run the country it can't even do a simple thing like this and get it right. Insidently what about the problem of dropout of the signal, dosen't happen with analoghue.
Posted by Dave Brierley, 21 Sep 2005
Signal problem not just in the country
Signal problems are not constrained to the country.
I live in Milton Keynes and have been running the Post Code check regularly for the past few years but still says no coverage.
If a 'modern' place like MK can't get it what hope has Shetland got ?
Tom
Posted by Tom Hass, 22 Sep 2005