.
/v3-uk/news/1992503/microsoft-blocks-live-messenger-access
23 May 2009, Phil Muncaster , V3
Microsoft is shutting off access to its Windows Live Messenger instant messaging service for users living in countries embargoed by the US, according to reports.
The countries affected by the ban are Cuba, Syria, Iran, Sudan and North Korea, said a ZDnet.com report.
When trying to log in they will be met with the following error message: " 810003c1: We are unable to sign you into the .NET Messenger Service. Reason: Microsoft has discontinued providing Instant Messenger services in certain countries subject to US sanctions. Details of these sanctions are available from the US Office of Foreign Assets Control."
According to ZDNet, a Microsoft spokesperson has confirmed the move although, as many of the sanctions imposed by the US date back nearly 10 years, it is currently uncertain why Microsoft has decided to follow them now by banning the service.
There was widespread anger among the user community last month when Microsoft's Windows Live and Hotmail services suffered a problem that left users without an inbox.
The problem occurred because of "a network issue that we encountered while doing routine maintenance", according to Microsoft. However, the news led to a flood of complaints from vnunet.com readers who had been unable to access their emails.
Many of them argued that the resolution service provided by Microsoft was substandard, with some saying it took much longer than the alleged two hours before they were back up and running.
Microsoft is not alone in feeling the wrath of its customers after problems with its webmail and IM services. Google's Gmail service was branded GFail by many after a major outage in February.
Do you agree?
These Countries Need More Outside Communication, Not Less
I don't know how many people subscribe to MSN in North Korea, but to the extent that the citizens of a country are online and chatting away, I would think it is in the US's interest to allow as much information to flow into those countries as possible. What's next, for the US to block access to NYTimes.com and CNN.com.
Posted by Stuart Friedman, 26 May 2009
How about Live Messenger Spam?
How about stopping the spam originating from Live Messenger to Yahoo Messenger clients?
Posted by J Dog, 27 May 2009
To Block a Net-tool is a Terrorist action!
And it's just one more step! Not the first one!
Wait...Watch and Pray!!!
Posted by Rui Sousa, 27 May 2009
What is Microsoft playing at?
This decision is late and as stupid as the US goverment for keeping the sanctions against Cuba. The embargo against Cuba has been in place for almost 50 years now so why is MSN enforcing it now when President Obama has tried to get closer to Cuba?
I will not partake in comments regarding the futility of this (ie web access in Cuba is censored/severely limited and the government favours open source so MSN's decision does not have much of an impact) but I find it ridiculous that a company like MSN decides to curb people's access to information on top of what the goverment does. Think! Any sanctions against goverments are sanctions against the people and people's access to information.
Posted by Nacho, 23 May 2009
I guess Microsoft likes supporting totalitarian governments!
By dropping MSN, Microsoft only helps these totalitarian governments further isolate their trapped constiuents from the outside world. Do you really think Ahmedinijad or Kim Il-Jung want their publics to be able to look past their borders and see how other people live freely and without fear of their government? Congradulations Microsoft on siding with a bunch of dictatorial !thugs.
Posted by Gary, 25 May 2009