Gartner claims that Microsoft is delaying virtualisation licensing changes because it wants to slow down the desktop virtualisation market
Microsoft 'sabotaging' desktop virtualisation
/v3-uk/news/1986533/microsoft-sabotaging-desktop-virtualisation
26 Jun 2007, Tom Sanders in California , V3
Microsoft's last minute decision not to ease virtualisation restrictions for Windows Vista is an "unjustified" attempt to "delay market adoption of competitive virtualisation software", analyst firm Gartner said in a new analysis.
The software giant was planning to change the licensing terms for Vista Home Basic and Vista Home Premium, allowing users to run the software in a virtual compartment.
The changes would further ease virtualisation restrictions for Vista Ultimate and Vista Business, which currently lack support for the Bitlocker data encryption technology and have restrictions on digital rights management.
But Microsoft pulled the planned changes at the last minute without explanation.
Gartner claims that Microsoft is delaying the licensing changes because it wants to slow down the desktop virtualisation market. The firm currently lacks a competitive virtualisation product and is not expected to catch up until 2009.
"Microsoft has a strong motivation to delay," wrote Gartner fellows Brian Gammage and Neil MacDonald, and research vice president Michael Silver.
The enterprise market for running a virtual desktop is currently limited to application testing for developers and security researchers.
Apple users have jumped on desktop virtualisation as way to run Windows XP and ensure access to applications which are not available on the OS X platform.
But Gartner noted that lifting virtualisation restrictions could increase Vista sales from Mac users.
Enterprises could eventually use desktop virtualisation to create so-called portable clients, where a user's operating system, application and data are stored on a central server.
All the data would be transferred to a virtual compartment on the computer where the user logs in, but this is currently impossible because of the DRM and Bitlocker restrictions.
Microsoft offers free desktop virtualisation through its Virtual PC 2007, but the software is considered inferior to competing products from vendors such as VMware and SWSoft, maker of the Parallels software.
Microsoft is also trailing behind its competitors in creating a virtualisation technology that relies on a hypervisor.
Instead of relying on a standalone virtualisation application such as Virtual PC 2007, hypervisor-based virtualisation is embedded into the main operating system which allows for better performance.
Microsoft has previously justified its virtualisation restrictions by arguing that virtualisation presents the user with security risks. The restrictions are intended to limit the technology to educated users and businesses.
Gartner dismissed these arguments as "overblown" and "fundamentally no different than those posed by consumers running Windows as 'administrators' today".
The analyst recommended that users looking for a virtual desktop use Windows XP, which has no restrictions in its licence.
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2010, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093
Do you agree?
Just yet another rerason to avoid Vista
Microsoft seem to be going out of its way to discourage users from taking up Vista..... license tied to hardware, DRM, very high hardware spec just to run the software, lack of hardware drivers and now this! Looks like the great marketing machine is stuck in reverse!! Clearly, anyone with any sense will stick to XP Pro which works reliably and gives us everything we need. Alternatively a good reason to move to Linux!
Posted by Mark, 26 Jun 2007
MS has forgotten who its real customers are
I think MS has fogotten who its real customers are. All of this is DRM related I think. The reluctance to allow virtualisation is partly at least, I think, because virtualisation makes it possible/easier to circumvent the DRM lock-downs implemented in Vista, which in turn is there to (attempt to) provide a secure copy protected channel for the media giants "warez." So, in short, from a DRM point of view, virtualization is therefore counter productive as it arguably weakens the DRM in Vista. And because it's precisely the end-users that the media moguls are trying to control, MS must therefore not allow their home offerings to be virtualized, and are probably pressured from the media industry in this regard, or if not, they're in any case regarding that as more important than delivering functionality to end-users.
Hence my point: MS has forgotten who its true customers are (end-users) and are instead pandering to the media industry. MS should realise that personally (and I suspect many other end-users) couldn't give a flying toss about what the wishes of a greedy media industry. They should not be trying to co-opt *my* PC that was paid for with *my* money, running an operating system that again I *paid* for in order to prevent me from doing legitimate things, and MS should certainly not be helping them in their quest. Each action like this pushes me as developer and customer away from them, and will eventually cause me to abandon the Windows platform altogether if it prevents me from doing obvious things that it should allow me.
Posted by A.N.Other, 19 Jul 2007