.
/v3-uk/news/1981462/image-spam-defeats-filters
01 Nov 2006, Will Head , V3
Spam messages that use images, rather than text, to ply their wares now account for 30 per cent of all unsolicited email, new figures show.
Stats released by security firm Secure Computing show that emails where spammers hide messages in image files to escape detection have increased 200 per cent over the past few months.
Filtering image spam is more difficult than with text-based messages as traditional methods are not effective.
"Image-based spam is a particularly difficult problem for a couple of reasons," said Michael Osterman, founder and principal of Osterman Research.
"It is much harder to detect with conventional spam filtering and blocking technologies, and is typically much larger than normal text-based spam, consuming much more bandwidth and storage."
Image spam can even defeat filters that use optical character recognition software to convert images into text.
"Traditional anti-spam software depends on content filtering techniques such as keyword filtering and Bayesian analysis to detect spam," said Dr Paul Judge, chief technology officer at Secure Computing.
"Even the technology used to recognise characters from images is not effective on today's image spam.
"Spammers are using advanced mathematical and graphical techniques like random modification of image pixels and dynamic construction of images from multiple components to bypass spam filtering tools."
Secure Computing claims that its TrustedSource engine can dynamically detect and block traffic from illegitimate sources.
TrustedSource collects information on email senders and the types of email they generate by accumulating data from more than 7,000 sensors located in 48 countries.
As a result, the company claims to be able to delete image spam before it hits the corporate mail server.
Do you agree?
Don't allow images.
I had this problem on the office server. The junk mail filtering does work quite well, but I can see an incrase of image only spam adverts so I've come up with the ultimate solution. If a HTML e-mail comes in then it's trashed. Only text e-mails are allowed through. I may consider stripping all graphics out and allowing HTML e-mails. On the site I manage the problewm is solved.
Posted by Myron, 02 Nov 2006
The coming disaster
I'm intrigued at the lack of coherent responses to this problem. Some people are blocking any mail with an image in it - which would kill many legitimate HTML mails. Some are implementing filters based on things like detecting the GIF89a tag in the image. These things are sloppy and ineffective in the long term.
I see no solution to this without actual inspection of the image itself, and I'm working on it. I picked a good time to start: the images are becoming harder to OCR (so I'm glad I'm not trying to do that).
I reckon image spam will become both more prevalent and more sophisticated. It needs to be attacked where it lives - this is no time for half-assed solutions.
CD
Posted by Chris Davis, 19 Nov 2006