.
/v3-uk/news/1979252/nasa-hitch-ride-japanese-spacecraft
21 Jul 2008, Simon Burns in Taipei , V3
Nasa is talking to Japan's space agency about using one of its spacecraft for servicing missions to the International Space Station, according to Japanese media reports.
Nasa has been considering various options to maintain its commitment to the Space Station after the Space Shuttle is retired from service in 2010.
Discussions between Nasa and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Jaxa) were described as "unofficial negotiations" by daily newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun.
The paper did not identify the source of its information, but said that the negotiations began in February.
Jaxa's 10-metre H-2 transfer vehicle can lift up to six tonnes of cargo into orbit, and is being designed and built in Japan by Jaxa, Mitsubishi and other contractors.
The first launch is expected next year on Japan's H-2B rocket, which is also under development.
Currently, Jaxa plans to launch one H-2 per year, carrying scientific experiments as it tests and develops the project. Each transfer vehicle costs approximately $131m, according to press reports.
The International Space Station requires regular supplies of food, water, oxygen and equipment.
While Russia offers the only viable alternative method of regularly transporting astronauts into space, there are several countries with the ability to launch non-human cargo, including Japan, the European Space Agency and China.
The ESA recently carried out the first successful test flight of its cargo carrying an automated transfer vehicle to the Space Station.
Do you agree?
about nasa hitching a ride on japanese space craft for four years
I disagree.......I have nothing against the other country,but we should always 'do our own thing'..
Posted by docpat, 21 Jul 2008
Well...
Personally, I would say that the help of other countries would be nice to get everything we want from the world/universe. Thinking logically, if we could get all the countries to collaborate over a single space mission and declare it equally among the countries who participated; things would probably go more smoothly.
Posted by Brandon, 22 Jul 2008
Well considering...
It seems Bush pulled this 2010 figure out of... well, you know.. Im not sure how valid this claim is that we will ACTUALLY retire them in 2010. Bush is the only one I've heard say anything about this. So it seems he's just looking to have a foothold in the future.
Posted by Ari, 22 Jul 2008
not to pick nits...
but it is NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) not Nasa ... ?næs? or Nasau .... even nasa would be better (and more consistent. These names are called, acronyms.
- some nits have to be picked.
Posted by drx1, 23 Jul 2008