.
/v3-uk/news/1974493/salesforcecom-outage-provokes-angry-response
07 Jan 2009, Phil Muncaster , V3
An outage at software-as-a-service pioneer Salesforce.com yesterday has provoked an angry reaction from some customers, and raised further questions about the reliability of the on-demand application delivery model.
Salesforce said that the service disruption affected all areas from 20.39 to 21.17 GMT on 6 January. "A core network device failed due to memory allocation errors," reads the incident report.
It is unlikely, therefore, to have affected many UK-based workers, but has caused deep concern among some US customers.
Many turned to their Twitter community to find out more details about the outage, as the vendor's trust.salesforce.com system status site was also down.
"Salesforce. Don't fail me when I need you the most!" wrote one Twitter user, while another said: "Salesforce crashes, Twitter/Google get hacked, what's next? I am going to switch to landlines and snail mail?"
Another user said: "Salesforce was down again today: ammunition for the on premise argument."
However, others were more forgiving. "I adore Salesforce.com; been using it for years. It has rarely hiccupped, which makes today remarkable (but not scary)," said one.
Another argued: "In a past life, a server outage would have been my problem. Now I let Salesforce do the dirty work."
Rob Bryant, a partner at consultancy Deloitte, argued that few companies would be able to achieve similar resilience to Salesforce.com in a cost-effective way in-house.
"Salesforce.com has an excellent track record, but on the rare occasions
that things do go wrong CIOs can sleep soundly knowing the right senior
engineers are working on the problem - engineers that their firm alone
may struggle to access with the same level of urgency," he added.
However, Steve Moyle, chief technology officer of database seucity firm Secerno, said the incident raises serious questions of trust for Salesforce.com.
"Almost a million users who have out-sourced a mission critical business function are paralysed and not able to access their own customer data, weakening their trust in the system," he added.
"Data owners must ensure that all of their data is fully protected and controlled to the point that no inappropriate use of the data can occur."
Salesforce.com said in a statement that it takes service performance "very seriously", and that any further information about the outage would be displayed on trust.salesforce.com as it becomes available.
Do you agree?
Service levels need to match Benioff's ambitions
When Salesforce.com had a whole month of bad performance some time back now I pointed out the issue with the company moving to becoming a platform rather than just a Sales Force Automation system.
If there is a business day outage on a sales focused CRM system you just get your sales people on the phone. If you are dependent on SFDC/Force.com for ALL your business applications, how you handle ALL your staff sitting around twiddling their thumbs is another matter...
If Benioff has loftier ambitions for his company, he needs to crank up his service levels to match.
Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
Posted by Ian Hendry, 08 Jan 2009
Don't worry, your customer data is safe
Because there is NO customer data native in salesforce.com. It's all prospect data. Your customer data is in you ERP system. Anyone who thinks salesforce.com is a CUSTOMER relationship managment product is mistaken!
Posted by John, 07 Jan 2009
The memory of a dog...
The argument that this builds a case for on-premise is ridiculous. It's amazing to me that people are so quick to forget the pain of having your in-house CRM system go down while your stoner IT guys are out for an extended lunch at Fridays...then finding out that they don't know what the problem is once they return.
I'm sure MOST small-to-midsize companies would do a FAR better job of managing up-time than a $1B+/yr SaaS company whose entire livelihood depends on avoiding extended outages.
Best of luck geniuses- when you crack the code on 100% uptime, you might want to start a SaaS provider.
Posted by DCR, 08 Jan 2009