.
/v3-uk/news/1970119/eu-commissioner-outlines-i2010-plans
06 Sep 2005, Iain Thomson , V3
The EU Commissioner for Information Society and Media today outlined proposed changes to the regulatory frameworks for broadcasting and radio spectrum licensing.
Viviane Reding said that the EU's current productivity gap is not a failure, but an opportunity that needs to be met.
She called on the heads of state of member countries and industrial stakeholders to work together, and promised that the EU would do its part.
Reding outlined three immediate priorities central to the EU's i2010 strategy. The first step is the establishment of a common information space in Europe with competitive and open markets.
This means eliminating trade barriers and "outdated regulation" such as the existing legal frameworks covering broadcasting.
"The regulations for broadcasters were designed in the 1980s," she told delegates at the i2010 conference in London.
"Consumers will be able to watch audio/visual content anytime, anywhere and on all platforms. Policy has to keep up so that we will have modern and flexible rules."
In September Reding will announce an EU proposal to rewrite the Televisions Without Frontiers directive to allow for modernisation and the distribution of European media. This includes a commitment to work towards interoperability, particularly on digital rights management software.
The radio spectrum is also a focus and Reding stated that she would be announcing a "market orientated strategy" for better spectrum allocation later this month which would be implemented in 2006. The role of regulators will also be examined.
The second priority is to boost low levels of spending on research and development across the EU. Reding pointed out that the US and Asia typically spend about a third of turnover on R&D but that the EU figure is barely 20 per cent.
While business must do its part, Reding promised that the EU would help to boost research spending.
"I propose to increase EU spending on R&D by 80 per cent from 2007," she said. "There is no doubt that we need to invest in the future of our industry. This cannot be done by bringing the EU budget down."
The third priority is that individual citizens of the EU must benefit from these changes. To this end Reding announced three areas that would be run as grassroots campaigns:
"We must draw together archives with multimedia search engines to bring EU culture online," she explained.
"We hope to make our rich cultural heritage available to all, and the entertainment industry can use these vast resources.
"Member states and the EU have responded favorably to this idea, and its implementation is a joint responsibility that requires the commitment of all of us."
Do you agree?
Are these measures really 'must have's?
This announcement seems to be a mixture of supply-side and demand-side measures designed to give everyone the impression of progress. But are these targets desirable for a society whose goal should be to become more civilised?
I get worried when politicians muck around with our television, ever since the Thatcher government of the 1980s (most of whom didn't watch TV) deregulated the UK networks. The result? Suddenly you had to start paying to watch soccer on TV. And there were so many channels offering a 24-hour service that parents have much more trouble getting their kids away from the telly to do their homework.
Of course, when I was a child, we had just 90 mins of kids' TV a day, and more hours and channels would have been high on my wish list. But that doesn't mean it would have been a good idea to grant me that wish.
Ditto with Internet access. We have a UK government run by a self-confessed technophobe (Blair) which is chucking the Internet at every school in the country, without any regard to the number of Internet games and chatroom addicts it is creating. Personally I believe the disadvantages of Web access outweigh the advantages for most kids [and perhaps also for many workers who should be concentrating on their jobs (like me!)], so I would ask governments to think seriously about going in almost the opposite direction and DENYING unregulated Web access to most under-16-year-olds.
Gone are the days when the EEC seriously thought it could build a serious rival to US giants like IBM. So today's EU commissioners are left instead with vague projects to broaden use of IT (on the demand side) and to encourage indigenous European start-ups (on the supply side) in the hope that the IT industry fragments.
I'm not convinced.
Posted by G Ravitino, 06 Sep 2005